Idealism Without Idealism

badiou's materialist renaissance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines a contemporary proposal of how to conceive of materialism, more specifically of a materialist dialectics (another name for an immanent materialism). This proposal was formulated by Alain Badiou and it is of huge interest for the contemporary discussion as it inscribes the very historical coordinates in which it was articulated into its own proposal. The article develops this by arguing that Badiou's materialist dialectic historically situates itself after idealist options seem to have become impossible. However, the very dialectical kernel of this materialism leads Badiou to claim that after the perpetuated struggle between materialism and idealism is declared to have been overcome, the very split separating the two returns in an inverted form inside materialism, splitting it again into two. Thereby the immanent split in materialism leads to two options: either one defends a materialism devoid of any idealist reference or a materialism which seeks to rescue something of idealism. The article concludes by suggesting that only from a detailed reconstruction of the functioning of philosophy in Badiou's system does it become possible to conceive of the threats that any materialism today faces and to delineate the proposed option of how to avoid them consistently. The article demonstrates how, today, materialism can only be properly materialist (without any metaphysical, mythical foundation) by resurrecting something of idealism, which is why it deserves the name of what I call an “idealism without idealism.”
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-98
Number of pages16
JournalAngelaki
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jun 2014

Fingerprint

idealism
materialism
Renaissance
dialectics
Alain Badiou
Idealism
Materialist
Materialism
reconstruction
threat

Cite this

@article{2005ed8e5e9543acb4a6af1d29f62b44,
title = "Idealism Without Idealism: badiou's materialist renaissance",
abstract = "This article examines a contemporary proposal of how to conceive of materialism, more specifically of a materialist dialectics (another name for an immanent materialism). This proposal was formulated by Alain Badiou and it is of huge interest for the contemporary discussion as it inscribes the very historical coordinates in which it was articulated into its own proposal. The article develops this by arguing that Badiou's materialist dialectic historically situates itself after idealist options seem to have become impossible. However, the very dialectical kernel of this materialism leads Badiou to claim that after the perpetuated struggle between materialism and idealism is declared to have been overcome, the very split separating the two returns in an inverted form inside materialism, splitting it again into two. Thereby the immanent split in materialism leads to two options: either one defends a materialism devoid of any idealist reference or a materialism which seeks to rescue something of idealism. The article concludes by suggesting that only from a detailed reconstruction of the functioning of philosophy in Badiou's system does it become possible to conceive of the threats that any materialism today faces and to delineate the proposed option of how to avoid them consistently. The article demonstrates how, today, materialism can only be properly materialist (without any metaphysical, mythical foundation) by resurrecting something of idealism, which is why it deserves the name of what I call an “idealism without idealism.”",
author = "Frank Ruda",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1080/0969725X.2014.920639",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "83--98",
journal = "Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities",
issn = "0969-725X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Idealism Without Idealism : badiou's materialist renaissance. / Ruda, Frank.

In: Angelaki, Vol. 19, No. 1, 13.06.2014, p. 83-98.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Idealism Without Idealism

T2 - badiou's materialist renaissance

AU - Ruda, Frank

PY - 2014/6/13

Y1 - 2014/6/13

N2 - This article examines a contemporary proposal of how to conceive of materialism, more specifically of a materialist dialectics (another name for an immanent materialism). This proposal was formulated by Alain Badiou and it is of huge interest for the contemporary discussion as it inscribes the very historical coordinates in which it was articulated into its own proposal. The article develops this by arguing that Badiou's materialist dialectic historically situates itself after idealist options seem to have become impossible. However, the very dialectical kernel of this materialism leads Badiou to claim that after the perpetuated struggle between materialism and idealism is declared to have been overcome, the very split separating the two returns in an inverted form inside materialism, splitting it again into two. Thereby the immanent split in materialism leads to two options: either one defends a materialism devoid of any idealist reference or a materialism which seeks to rescue something of idealism. The article concludes by suggesting that only from a detailed reconstruction of the functioning of philosophy in Badiou's system does it become possible to conceive of the threats that any materialism today faces and to delineate the proposed option of how to avoid them consistently. The article demonstrates how, today, materialism can only be properly materialist (without any metaphysical, mythical foundation) by resurrecting something of idealism, which is why it deserves the name of what I call an “idealism without idealism.”

AB - This article examines a contemporary proposal of how to conceive of materialism, more specifically of a materialist dialectics (another name for an immanent materialism). This proposal was formulated by Alain Badiou and it is of huge interest for the contemporary discussion as it inscribes the very historical coordinates in which it was articulated into its own proposal. The article develops this by arguing that Badiou's materialist dialectic historically situates itself after idealist options seem to have become impossible. However, the very dialectical kernel of this materialism leads Badiou to claim that after the perpetuated struggle between materialism and idealism is declared to have been overcome, the very split separating the two returns in an inverted form inside materialism, splitting it again into two. Thereby the immanent split in materialism leads to two options: either one defends a materialism devoid of any idealist reference or a materialism which seeks to rescue something of idealism. The article concludes by suggesting that only from a detailed reconstruction of the functioning of philosophy in Badiou's system does it become possible to conceive of the threats that any materialism today faces and to delineate the proposed option of how to avoid them consistently. The article demonstrates how, today, materialism can only be properly materialist (without any metaphysical, mythical foundation) by resurrecting something of idealism, which is why it deserves the name of what I call an “idealism without idealism.”

U2 - 10.1080/0969725X.2014.920639

DO - 10.1080/0969725X.2014.920639

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 83

EP - 98

JO - Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities

JF - Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities

SN - 0969-725X

IS - 1

ER -