Identity construction and British Muslims' political activity: Beyond rational actor theory

Nick Hopkins, Vered Kahani-Hopkins

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    43 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Political activity is often addressed in terms of rational actor theory (RAT). We review RAT's psychological assumptions and highlight the neglect of collective identity. In turn, we view the perception of ‘interest’ as contingent upon constructions of identity and explore how different characterizations of collective identity are organized strategically so as to shape people's understandings of their interests and how they should act to realize them. Using examples taken from a study of British Muslims’ political activity we emphasize the contested and strategic dimension to identity construction and analyse how activists addressing the same constituency construe Muslim identity in different ways so as to promote different conceptions of collective interest. Specifically, we explore the contested invocations of Prophetic example in the definition of Muslim identity. The broader thrust behind this work is a critique of the sharp dichotomization of Muslim and non-Muslim political activity. We maintain that essentially similar processes of identity construction underlie all attempts to organize collective sentiment and political action (including that comprising so-called ‘conventional’ electoralist politics in the West), and that conceiving of identity as a site of political struggle underscores the inadequacy of Orientalist characterizations of Muslim identity in terms of a singular, transhistorical essence.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)339-356
    Number of pages18
    JournalBritish Journal of Social Psychology
    Volume43
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Identity construction and British Muslims' political activity: Beyond rational actor theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this