Implementation in rehabilitation

A roadmap for practitioners and researchers

Jacqui Morris (Lead / Corresponding author), Susanne Bernhardsson, Marie-Louise Bird, Louise Connell, Elizabeth Lynch, Kathryn Jarvis, Nicola M. Kayes, Kim Miller, Suzie Mudge, Rebecca Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Despite growth in rehabilitation research, implementing research findings into rehabilitation practice has been slow. This creates inequities for patients and is an ethical issue. However, methods to investigate and facilitate evidence implementation are being developed. This paper aims to make these methods relevant and accessible for rehabilitation researchers and practitioners. Methods: Rehabilitation practice is varied and complex and occurs within multilevel healthcare systems. Using a “road map” analogy, we describe how implementation concepts and theories can inform implementation strategies in rehabilitation. The roadmap involves a staged journey that considers: the nature of evidence; context for implementation; navigation tools for implementation; strategies to facilitate implementation; evaluation of implementation outcomes; and sustainability of implementation. We have developed a model to illustrate the journey, and four case studies exemplify implementation stages in rehabilitation settings. Results and Conclusions: Effective implementation strategies for the complex world of rehabilitation are urgently required. The journey we describe unpacks that complexity to provide a template for effective implementation, to facilitate translation of the growing evidence base in rehabilitation into improved patient outcomes. It emphasizes the importance of understanding context and application of relevant theory, and highlights areas which should be targeted in new implementation research in rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitation Effective implementation of research evidence into rehabilitation practice has many interconnected steps and a roadmap analogy is helpful in defining them. Understanding context for implementation is critically important and using theory can facilitate development of understanding. Research methods for implementation in rehabilitation should be carefully selected and outcomes should evaluate implementation success as well as clinical change. Sustainability requires regular revisiting of the interconnected steps.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages10
JournalDisability and Rehabilitation
Early online date12 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Research Personnel
Research
Ethics
Delivery of Health Care
Growth

Keywords

  • Knowledge translation
  • implementation context
  • implementation science
  • rehabilitation

Cite this

Morris, Jacqui ; Bernhardsson, Susanne ; Bird, Marie-Louise ; Connell, Louise ; Lynch, Elizabeth ; Jarvis, Kathryn ; Kayes, Nicola M. ; Miller, Kim ; Mudge, Suzie ; Fisher, Rebecca. / Implementation in rehabilitation : A roadmap for practitioners and researchers. In: Disability and Rehabilitation. 2019.
@article{468a0b2454904c58be10fb1286e4dec5,
title = "Implementation in rehabilitation: A roadmap for practitioners and researchers",
abstract = "Purpose: Despite growth in rehabilitation research, implementing research findings into rehabilitation practice has been slow. This creates inequities for patients and is an ethical issue. However, methods to investigate and facilitate evidence implementation are being developed. This paper aims to make these methods relevant and accessible for rehabilitation researchers and practitioners. Methods: Rehabilitation practice is varied and complex and occurs within multilevel healthcare systems. Using a “road map” analogy, we describe how implementation concepts and theories can inform implementation strategies in rehabilitation. The roadmap involves a staged journey that considers: the nature of evidence; context for implementation; navigation tools for implementation; strategies to facilitate implementation; evaluation of implementation outcomes; and sustainability of implementation. We have developed a model to illustrate the journey, and four case studies exemplify implementation stages in rehabilitation settings. Results and Conclusions: Effective implementation strategies for the complex world of rehabilitation are urgently required. The journey we describe unpacks that complexity to provide a template for effective implementation, to facilitate translation of the growing evidence base in rehabilitation into improved patient outcomes. It emphasizes the importance of understanding context and application of relevant theory, and highlights areas which should be targeted in new implementation research in rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitation Effective implementation of research evidence into rehabilitation practice has many interconnected steps and a roadmap analogy is helpful in defining them. Understanding context for implementation is critically important and using theory can facilitate development of understanding. Research methods for implementation in rehabilitation should be carefully selected and outcomes should evaluate implementation success as well as clinical change. Sustainability requires regular revisiting of the interconnected steps.",
keywords = "Knowledge translation, implementation context, implementation science, rehabilitation",
author = "Jacqui Morris and Susanne Bernhardsson and Marie-Louise Bird and Louise Connell and Elizabeth Lynch and Kathryn Jarvis and Kayes, {Nicola M.} and Kim Miller and Suzie Mudge and Rebecca Fisher",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/09638288.2019.1587013",
language = "English",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

Morris, J, Bernhardsson, S, Bird, M-L, Connell, L, Lynch, E, Jarvis, K, Kayes, NM, Miller, K, Mudge, S & Fisher, R 2019, 'Implementation in rehabilitation: A roadmap for practitioners and researchers', Disability and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1587013

Implementation in rehabilitation : A roadmap for practitioners and researchers. / Morris, Jacqui (Lead / Corresponding author); Bernhardsson, Susanne; Bird, Marie-Louise; Connell, Louise; Lynch, Elizabeth; Jarvis, Kathryn; Kayes, Nicola M.; Miller, Kim; Mudge, Suzie; Fisher, Rebecca.

In: Disability and Rehabilitation, 12.04.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation in rehabilitation

T2 - A roadmap for practitioners and researchers

AU - Morris, Jacqui

AU - Bernhardsson, Susanne

AU - Bird, Marie-Louise

AU - Connell, Louise

AU - Lynch, Elizabeth

AU - Jarvis, Kathryn

AU - Kayes, Nicola M.

AU - Miller, Kim

AU - Mudge, Suzie

AU - Fisher, Rebecca

PY - 2019/4/12

Y1 - 2019/4/12

N2 - Purpose: Despite growth in rehabilitation research, implementing research findings into rehabilitation practice has been slow. This creates inequities for patients and is an ethical issue. However, methods to investigate and facilitate evidence implementation are being developed. This paper aims to make these methods relevant and accessible for rehabilitation researchers and practitioners. Methods: Rehabilitation practice is varied and complex and occurs within multilevel healthcare systems. Using a “road map” analogy, we describe how implementation concepts and theories can inform implementation strategies in rehabilitation. The roadmap involves a staged journey that considers: the nature of evidence; context for implementation; navigation tools for implementation; strategies to facilitate implementation; evaluation of implementation outcomes; and sustainability of implementation. We have developed a model to illustrate the journey, and four case studies exemplify implementation stages in rehabilitation settings. Results and Conclusions: Effective implementation strategies for the complex world of rehabilitation are urgently required. The journey we describe unpacks that complexity to provide a template for effective implementation, to facilitate translation of the growing evidence base in rehabilitation into improved patient outcomes. It emphasizes the importance of understanding context and application of relevant theory, and highlights areas which should be targeted in new implementation research in rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitation Effective implementation of research evidence into rehabilitation practice has many interconnected steps and a roadmap analogy is helpful in defining them. Understanding context for implementation is critically important and using theory can facilitate development of understanding. Research methods for implementation in rehabilitation should be carefully selected and outcomes should evaluate implementation success as well as clinical change. Sustainability requires regular revisiting of the interconnected steps.

AB - Purpose: Despite growth in rehabilitation research, implementing research findings into rehabilitation practice has been slow. This creates inequities for patients and is an ethical issue. However, methods to investigate and facilitate evidence implementation are being developed. This paper aims to make these methods relevant and accessible for rehabilitation researchers and practitioners. Methods: Rehabilitation practice is varied and complex and occurs within multilevel healthcare systems. Using a “road map” analogy, we describe how implementation concepts and theories can inform implementation strategies in rehabilitation. The roadmap involves a staged journey that considers: the nature of evidence; context for implementation; navigation tools for implementation; strategies to facilitate implementation; evaluation of implementation outcomes; and sustainability of implementation. We have developed a model to illustrate the journey, and four case studies exemplify implementation stages in rehabilitation settings. Results and Conclusions: Effective implementation strategies for the complex world of rehabilitation are urgently required. The journey we describe unpacks that complexity to provide a template for effective implementation, to facilitate translation of the growing evidence base in rehabilitation into improved patient outcomes. It emphasizes the importance of understanding context and application of relevant theory, and highlights areas which should be targeted in new implementation research in rehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitation Effective implementation of research evidence into rehabilitation practice has many interconnected steps and a roadmap analogy is helpful in defining them. Understanding context for implementation is critically important and using theory can facilitate development of understanding. Research methods for implementation in rehabilitation should be carefully selected and outcomes should evaluate implementation success as well as clinical change. Sustainability requires regular revisiting of the interconnected steps.

KW - Knowledge translation

KW - implementation context

KW - implementation science

KW - rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064484696&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587013

DO - 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587013

M3 - Article

JO - Disability and Rehabilitation

JF - Disability and Rehabilitation

SN - 0963-8288

ER -