TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of growth media on the biomechanical properties of the fibrous roots of two contrasting vetiver grass species
AU - Likitlersuang, Suched
AU - Phan, Trung Nghia
AU - Boldrin, David
AU - Leung, Anthony Kwan
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded by the National Research Council of Thailand, Thailand (Grant no. NRCT5-RSA63001-05), the Ratchadapisek Sompoch Endowment Fund (2021), Chulalongkorn University, Thailand (764002-ENV), and the Second Century Fund (C2F), Chulalongkorn University, Thailand . The work was carried out under the research and development project on landslide prevention and protection in accordance with the Royal Initiatives of the Chaipattana Foundation. The authors would like to thank Mr. Nathapon Vorakamol and Dr. Veerayut Komolvilas for their assistance during laboratory testing. The author (A.K. Leung) acknowledges the financial support provided by the General Research Fund (GRF; Grant no. 16202720 ) of the Hong Kong Research Grants Council and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; Grant no. 51922112 ). The author (D. Boldrin) acknowledges the financial support provided by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council ( EP/R005834/1 ), and The James Hutton Institute receives funding from the Rural & Environment Science & Analytical Services Division of the Scottish Government .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Different artificial (non-soil) growth media have been used to cultivate plants for measuring their root biomechanical properties and estimating root reinforcement to soil. However, the effect of growth media on root tensile strength and Young's modulus has rarely been investigated. We studied the effects of three contrasting growth media (hydroponic, rice husk ash, and lateritic soil) on the biomechanical properties of the fibrous roots of two contrasting vetiver species (Chrysopogon nemoralis and Chrysopogon zizanioides). After growing in the different media for 7 weeks, the tensile strength and Young's modulus of both species were measured via uniaxial tensile tests. Roots grown in the ash were the strongest (10.21 ± 0.8 and 9.46 ± 1.1 MPa for C. nemoralis and C. zizanioides, respectively) and stiffest (275.98 ± 20.6 and 172.74 ± 26.3 MPa, respectively), followed by those grown in the soil (9.1 ± 0.9 and 6.18 ± 0.5 MPa for strength; 182.3 ± 16.9 and 81.88 ± 5.3 MPa for modulus) and then those grown hydroponically (5.99 ± 0.5 and 5.87 ± 0.5 MPa for strength; 107.06 ± 10.8 and 82.13 ± 7.8 MPa for modulus). Irrespective of the growth treatments, root strength and modulus were correlated with root diameter by a negative power law model (R2 ranged between 0.11 and 0.68; p-value <0.05). The shape and scale factors of the strength–diameter and modulus–diameter correlations were different among the growth treatments. We caution the use of the tensile properties of roots grown in artificial media and laboratory conditions for predicting root reinforcement to natural soil on slopes.
AB - Different artificial (non-soil) growth media have been used to cultivate plants for measuring their root biomechanical properties and estimating root reinforcement to soil. However, the effect of growth media on root tensile strength and Young's modulus has rarely been investigated. We studied the effects of three contrasting growth media (hydroponic, rice husk ash, and lateritic soil) on the biomechanical properties of the fibrous roots of two contrasting vetiver species (Chrysopogon nemoralis and Chrysopogon zizanioides). After growing in the different media for 7 weeks, the tensile strength and Young's modulus of both species were measured via uniaxial tensile tests. Roots grown in the ash were the strongest (10.21 ± 0.8 and 9.46 ± 1.1 MPa for C. nemoralis and C. zizanioides, respectively) and stiffest (275.98 ± 20.6 and 172.74 ± 26.3 MPa, respectively), followed by those grown in the soil (9.1 ± 0.9 and 6.18 ± 0.5 MPa for strength; 182.3 ± 16.9 and 81.88 ± 5.3 MPa for modulus) and then those grown hydroponically (5.99 ± 0.5 and 5.87 ± 0.5 MPa for strength; 107.06 ± 10.8 and 82.13 ± 7.8 MPa for modulus). Irrespective of the growth treatments, root strength and modulus were correlated with root diameter by a negative power law model (R2 ranged between 0.11 and 0.68; p-value <0.05). The shape and scale factors of the strength–diameter and modulus–diameter correlations were different among the growth treatments. We caution the use of the tensile properties of roots grown in artificial media and laboratory conditions for predicting root reinforcement to natural soil on slopes.
KW - Growth media
KW - Nutrient contents
KW - Root biomechanical properties
KW - Vetiver grass
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124485544&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106574
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106574
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124485544
SN - 0925-8574
VL - 178
SP - 1
EP - 6
JO - Ecological Engineering
JF - Ecological Engineering
M1 - 106574
ER -