Informed momentum trading versus uninformed " naive" investors strategies

A. Banerjee, Chi-Hsiou Hung

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    We construct a zero net-worth uninformed " naive investor" who uses a random portfolio allocation strategy. We then compare the returns of the momentum strategist to the return distribution of naive investors. For this purpose we reward momentum profits relative to the return percentiles of the naive investors with scores that are symmetric around the median. The score function thus constructed is invariant and robust to risk factor models. We find that the average scores of the momentum strategies are close to zero (the score of the median) and statistically insignificant over the sample period between 1926 and 2005, various sub-sample periods including the periods examined in Jegadeesh and Titman (1993, 2001). The findings are robust with respect to sampling or period-specific effects, tightened score intervals, and the imposition of maximum-weight restrictions on the naive strategies to mitigate market friction considerations.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3077-3089
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of Banking and Finance
    Volume35
    Issue number11
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011

    Fingerprint

    Investors
    Momentum trading
    Median
    Weight restrictions
    Reward
    Return distribution
    Sampling
    Momentum profits
    Market frictions
    Net worth
    Risk factors
    Momentum
    Momentum strategies
    Portfolio allocation

    Cite this

    Banerjee, A. ; Hung, Chi-Hsiou. / Informed momentum trading versus uninformed " naive" investors strategies. In: Journal of Banking and Finance. 2011 ; Vol. 35, No. 11. pp. 3077-3089.
    @article{b7dd93898d8142b4a06aadf03feae07a,
    title = "Informed momentum trading versus uninformed {"} naive{"} investors strategies",
    abstract = "We construct a zero net-worth uninformed {"} naive investor{"} who uses a random portfolio allocation strategy. We then compare the returns of the momentum strategist to the return distribution of naive investors. For this purpose we reward momentum profits relative to the return percentiles of the naive investors with scores that are symmetric around the median. The score function thus constructed is invariant and robust to risk factor models. We find that the average scores of the momentum strategies are close to zero (the score of the median) and statistically insignificant over the sample period between 1926 and 2005, various sub-sample periods including the periods examined in Jegadeesh and Titman (1993, 2001). The findings are robust with respect to sampling or period-specific effects, tightened score intervals, and the imposition of maximum-weight restrictions on the naive strategies to mitigate market friction considerations.",
    author = "A. Banerjee and Chi-Hsiou Hung",
    note = "Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
    year = "2011",
    month = "11",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.04.005",
    language = "English",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "3077--3089",
    journal = "Journal of Banking and Finance",
    issn = "0378-4266",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "11",

    }

    Informed momentum trading versus uninformed " naive" investors strategies. / Banerjee, A.; Hung, Chi-Hsiou.

    In: Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 35, No. 11, 11.2011, p. 3077-3089.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Informed momentum trading versus uninformed " naive" investors strategies

    AU - Banerjee, A.

    AU - Hung, Chi-Hsiou

    N1 - Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    PY - 2011/11

    Y1 - 2011/11

    N2 - We construct a zero net-worth uninformed " naive investor" who uses a random portfolio allocation strategy. We then compare the returns of the momentum strategist to the return distribution of naive investors. For this purpose we reward momentum profits relative to the return percentiles of the naive investors with scores that are symmetric around the median. The score function thus constructed is invariant and robust to risk factor models. We find that the average scores of the momentum strategies are close to zero (the score of the median) and statistically insignificant over the sample period between 1926 and 2005, various sub-sample periods including the periods examined in Jegadeesh and Titman (1993, 2001). The findings are robust with respect to sampling or period-specific effects, tightened score intervals, and the imposition of maximum-weight restrictions on the naive strategies to mitigate market friction considerations.

    AB - We construct a zero net-worth uninformed " naive investor" who uses a random portfolio allocation strategy. We then compare the returns of the momentum strategist to the return distribution of naive investors. For this purpose we reward momentum profits relative to the return percentiles of the naive investors with scores that are symmetric around the median. The score function thus constructed is invariant and robust to risk factor models. We find that the average scores of the momentum strategies are close to zero (the score of the median) and statistically insignificant over the sample period between 1926 and 2005, various sub-sample periods including the periods examined in Jegadeesh and Titman (1993, 2001). The findings are robust with respect to sampling or period-specific effects, tightened score intervals, and the imposition of maximum-weight restrictions on the naive strategies to mitigate market friction considerations.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052180806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.04.005

    DO - 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.04.005

    M3 - Article

    VL - 35

    SP - 3077

    EP - 3089

    JO - Journal of Banking and Finance

    JF - Journal of Banking and Finance

    SN - 0378-4266

    IS - 11

    ER -