Inhumanity's law: Crimes against humanity RtoP and South Sudan

Lars Waldorf (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

This article addresses the question whether the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) promotes a 'common humanity'. It observes how overt references to common humanity have receded from the RtoP discourse with the World Summit Outcome (WSO) in 2005. Nonetheless, the WSO prompted greater attention to crimes against humanity, which might conceivably strengthen a minimalist conception of humanity through the prosecution of its opposite number, inhumanity. This article tests Ruti Teitel's argument that 'humanity law' is reshaping the discourse of international politics by looking at the UN Security Council debates over RtoP in South Sudan. It concludes that the Council's failure to refer South Sudan to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity further weakens RtoP's potential to communicate a solidarist norm.
LanguageEnglish
Pages49-66
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Politics
Volume53
Issue number1
Early online date8 Dec 2015
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2016

Fingerprint

South Sudan
crime
offense
responsibility
Law
UN Security Council
International Criminal Court
discourse
International Politics
prosecution
world

Cite this

@article{cb3e31cc595c40b390a08f0a684a7424,
title = "Inhumanity's law: Crimes against humanity RtoP and South Sudan",
abstract = "This article addresses the question whether the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) promotes a 'common humanity'. It observes how overt references to common humanity have receded from the RtoP discourse with the World Summit Outcome (WSO) in 2005. Nonetheless, the WSO prompted greater attention to crimes against humanity, which might conceivably strengthen a minimalist conception of humanity through the prosecution of its opposite number, inhumanity. This article tests Ruti Teitel's argument that 'humanity law' is reshaping the discourse of international politics by looking at the UN Security Council debates over RtoP in South Sudan. It concludes that the Council's failure to refer South Sudan to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity further weakens RtoP's potential to communicate a solidarist norm.",
author = "Lars Waldorf",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1057/ip.2015.37",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "49--66",
journal = "International Politics",
issn = "1384-5748",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",
number = "1",

}

Inhumanity's law : Crimes against humanity RtoP and South Sudan. / Waldorf, Lars (Lead / Corresponding author).

In: International Politics, Vol. 53, No. 1, 01.2016, p. 49-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhumanity's law

T2 - International Politics

AU - Waldorf,Lars

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - This article addresses the question whether the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) promotes a 'common humanity'. It observes how overt references to common humanity have receded from the RtoP discourse with the World Summit Outcome (WSO) in 2005. Nonetheless, the WSO prompted greater attention to crimes against humanity, which might conceivably strengthen a minimalist conception of humanity through the prosecution of its opposite number, inhumanity. This article tests Ruti Teitel's argument that 'humanity law' is reshaping the discourse of international politics by looking at the UN Security Council debates over RtoP in South Sudan. It concludes that the Council's failure to refer South Sudan to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity further weakens RtoP's potential to communicate a solidarist norm.

AB - This article addresses the question whether the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) promotes a 'common humanity'. It observes how overt references to common humanity have receded from the RtoP discourse with the World Summit Outcome (WSO) in 2005. Nonetheless, the WSO prompted greater attention to crimes against humanity, which might conceivably strengthen a minimalist conception of humanity through the prosecution of its opposite number, inhumanity. This article tests Ruti Teitel's argument that 'humanity law' is reshaping the discourse of international politics by looking at the UN Security Council debates over RtoP in South Sudan. It concludes that the Council's failure to refer South Sudan to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity further weakens RtoP's potential to communicate a solidarist norm.

U2 - 10.1057/ip.2015.37

DO - 10.1057/ip.2015.37

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 49

EP - 66

JO - International Politics

JF - International Politics

SN - 1384-5748

IS - 1

ER -