Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions

Alan Kennedy, Wayne S. Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2 experiments with 52 college students, ambiguous and unambiguous sentences of varying length were presented in 3 conditions: (1) central--each word of the sentence appearing in the same central location; (2) sequential--single words appearing in their appropriate spatial locations; and (3) cumulative--a condition identical to sequential, except that previously presented text remained in view. In all cases, interresponse times (IRTs [i.e., inspection times per word]) were recorded during reading. Results show that patterns of word-by-word reading times varied for the same materials depending on their mode of presentation, confirming previous findings by M. A. Just et al (see record 1982-29564-001). In the cumulative mode, Ss were sensitive to syntactic ambiguity. This was not true in the central presentation. The spatial location mode produced patterns of IRTs that resembled those in the central mode, apart from the tendency to spend longer on the final word. Data suggest that appropriate syntactic processing may critically depend on the reader's ability to reinspect portions of the text. This conclusion was further supported by direct observation of the reader's eye movement as the task was performed. The experimental items and questions are appended. (22 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)833-849
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1984

Fingerprint

Reading
Eye Movements
Observation
Students
Syntax
Reader
Item Response Theory
Appearings
Word Reading
College Students
Syntactic Processing
Mode of Presentation
Experiment
Syntactic Ambiguity
Reading Time
Length

Keywords

  • syntactic ambiguity of sentences of varying length, inspection times for words, college students

Cite this

@article{346b11b24807475d97dec4f8655e5e03,
title = "Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions",
abstract = "In 2 experiments with 52 college students, ambiguous and unambiguous sentences of varying length were presented in 3 conditions: (1) central--each word of the sentence appearing in the same central location; (2) sequential--single words appearing in their appropriate spatial locations; and (3) cumulative--a condition identical to sequential, except that previously presented text remained in view. In all cases, interresponse times (IRTs [i.e., inspection times per word]) were recorded during reading. Results show that patterns of word-by-word reading times varied for the same materials depending on their mode of presentation, confirming previous findings by M. A. Just et al (see record 1982-29564-001). In the cumulative mode, Ss were sensitive to syntactic ambiguity. This was not true in the central presentation. The spatial location mode produced patterns of IRTs that resembled those in the central mode, apart from the tendency to spend longer on the final word. Data suggest that appropriate syntactic processing may critically depend on the reader's ability to reinspect portions of the text. This conclusion was further supported by direct observation of the reader's eye movement as the task was performed. The experimental items and questions are appended. (22 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "syntactic ambiguity of sentences of varying length, inspection times for words, college students",
author = "Alan Kennedy and Murray, {Wayne S.}",
year = "1984",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/0096-1523.10.6.833",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "833--849",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "6",

}

Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions. / Kennedy, Alan; Murray, Wayne S.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 10, No. 6, 12.1984, p. 833-849.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentences under three presentation conditions

AU - Kennedy, Alan

AU - Murray, Wayne S.

PY - 1984/12

Y1 - 1984/12

N2 - In 2 experiments with 52 college students, ambiguous and unambiguous sentences of varying length were presented in 3 conditions: (1) central--each word of the sentence appearing in the same central location; (2) sequential--single words appearing in their appropriate spatial locations; and (3) cumulative--a condition identical to sequential, except that previously presented text remained in view. In all cases, interresponse times (IRTs [i.e., inspection times per word]) were recorded during reading. Results show that patterns of word-by-word reading times varied for the same materials depending on their mode of presentation, confirming previous findings by M. A. Just et al (see record 1982-29564-001). In the cumulative mode, Ss were sensitive to syntactic ambiguity. This was not true in the central presentation. The spatial location mode produced patterns of IRTs that resembled those in the central mode, apart from the tendency to spend longer on the final word. Data suggest that appropriate syntactic processing may critically depend on the reader's ability to reinspect portions of the text. This conclusion was further supported by direct observation of the reader's eye movement as the task was performed. The experimental items and questions are appended. (22 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - In 2 experiments with 52 college students, ambiguous and unambiguous sentences of varying length were presented in 3 conditions: (1) central--each word of the sentence appearing in the same central location; (2) sequential--single words appearing in their appropriate spatial locations; and (3) cumulative--a condition identical to sequential, except that previously presented text remained in view. In all cases, interresponse times (IRTs [i.e., inspection times per word]) were recorded during reading. Results show that patterns of word-by-word reading times varied for the same materials depending on their mode of presentation, confirming previous findings by M. A. Just et al (see record 1982-29564-001). In the cumulative mode, Ss were sensitive to syntactic ambiguity. This was not true in the central presentation. The spatial location mode produced patterns of IRTs that resembled those in the central mode, apart from the tendency to spend longer on the final word. Data suggest that appropriate syntactic processing may critically depend on the reader's ability to reinspect portions of the text. This conclusion was further supported by direct observation of the reader's eye movement as the task was performed. The experimental items and questions are appended. (22 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - syntactic ambiguity of sentences of varying length, inspection times for words, college students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047685895&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0096-1523.10.6.833

DO - 10.1037/0096-1523.10.6.833

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047685895

VL - 10

SP - 833

EP - 849

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 6

ER -