Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management

Christopher M. Raymond, Ioan Fazey, Mark S. Reed, Lindsay C. Stringer, Guy M. Robinson, Anna C. Evely

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    419 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper evaluates the processes and mechanisms available for integrating different types of knowledge for environmental management. Following a review of the challenges associated with knowledge integration, we present a series of questions for identifying, engaging, evaluating and applying different knowledges during project design and delivery. These questions are used as a basis to compare three environmental management projects that aimed to integrate knowledge from different sources in the United Kingdom, Solomon Islands and Australia. Comparative results indicate that integrating different types of knowledge is inherently complex – classification of knowledge is arbitrary and knowledge integration perspectives are qualitatively very different. We argue that there is no single optimum approach for integrating local and scientific knowledge and encourage a shift in science from the development of knowledge integration products to the development of problem-focussed, knowledge integration processes. These processes need to be systematic, reflexive and cyclic so that multiple views and multiple methods are considered in relation to an environmental management problem. The results have implications for the way in which researchers and environmental managers undertake and evaluate knowledge integration projects.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1766-1777
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Environmental Management
    Volume91
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

    Fingerprint

    Environmental management
    environmental management
    Managers
    project design

    Cite this

    Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M., & Evely, A. C. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8), 1766-1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023
    Raymond, Christopher M. ; Fazey, Ioan ; Reed, Mark S. ; Stringer, Lindsay C. ; Robinson, Guy M. ; Evely, Anna C. / Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. In: Journal of Environmental Management. 2010 ; Vol. 91, No. 8. pp. 1766-1777.
    @article{30317ef7ec28431fab4d79dca6db6970,
    title = "Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management",
    abstract = "This paper evaluates the processes and mechanisms available for integrating different types of knowledge for environmental management. Following a review of the challenges associated with knowledge integration, we present a series of questions for identifying, engaging, evaluating and applying different knowledges during project design and delivery. These questions are used as a basis to compare three environmental management projects that aimed to integrate knowledge from different sources in the United Kingdom, Solomon Islands and Australia. Comparative results indicate that integrating different types of knowledge is inherently complex – classification of knowledge is arbitrary and knowledge integration perspectives are qualitatively very different. We argue that there is no single optimum approach for integrating local and scientific knowledge and encourage a shift in science from the development of knowledge integration products to the development of problem-focussed, knowledge integration processes. These processes need to be systematic, reflexive and cyclic so that multiple views and multiple methods are considered in relation to an environmental management problem. The results have implications for the way in which researchers and environmental managers undertake and evaluate knowledge integration projects.",
    author = "Raymond, {Christopher M.} and Ioan Fazey and Reed, {Mark S.} and Stringer, {Lindsay C.} and Robinson, {Guy M.} and Evely, {Anna C.}",
    year = "2010",
    month = "8",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023",
    language = "English",
    volume = "91",
    pages = "1766--1777",
    journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
    issn = "0301-4797",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "8",

    }

    Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. / Raymond, Christopher M.; Fazey, Ioan; Reed, Mark S.; Stringer, Lindsay C.; Robinson, Guy M.; Evely, Anna C.

    In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 91, No. 8, 08.2010, p. 1766-1777.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management

    AU - Raymond, Christopher M.

    AU - Fazey, Ioan

    AU - Reed, Mark S.

    AU - Stringer, Lindsay C.

    AU - Robinson, Guy M.

    AU - Evely, Anna C.

    PY - 2010/8

    Y1 - 2010/8

    N2 - This paper evaluates the processes and mechanisms available for integrating different types of knowledge for environmental management. Following a review of the challenges associated with knowledge integration, we present a series of questions for identifying, engaging, evaluating and applying different knowledges during project design and delivery. These questions are used as a basis to compare three environmental management projects that aimed to integrate knowledge from different sources in the United Kingdom, Solomon Islands and Australia. Comparative results indicate that integrating different types of knowledge is inherently complex – classification of knowledge is arbitrary and knowledge integration perspectives are qualitatively very different. We argue that there is no single optimum approach for integrating local and scientific knowledge and encourage a shift in science from the development of knowledge integration products to the development of problem-focussed, knowledge integration processes. These processes need to be systematic, reflexive and cyclic so that multiple views and multiple methods are considered in relation to an environmental management problem. The results have implications for the way in which researchers and environmental managers undertake and evaluate knowledge integration projects.

    AB - This paper evaluates the processes and mechanisms available for integrating different types of knowledge for environmental management. Following a review of the challenges associated with knowledge integration, we present a series of questions for identifying, engaging, evaluating and applying different knowledges during project design and delivery. These questions are used as a basis to compare three environmental management projects that aimed to integrate knowledge from different sources in the United Kingdom, Solomon Islands and Australia. Comparative results indicate that integrating different types of knowledge is inherently complex – classification of knowledge is arbitrary and knowledge integration perspectives are qualitatively very different. We argue that there is no single optimum approach for integrating local and scientific knowledge and encourage a shift in science from the development of knowledge integration products to the development of problem-focussed, knowledge integration processes. These processes need to be systematic, reflexive and cyclic so that multiple views and multiple methods are considered in relation to an environmental management problem. The results have implications for the way in which researchers and environmental managers undertake and evaluate knowledge integration projects.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023

    DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023

    M3 - Article

    VL - 91

    SP - 1766

    EP - 1777

    JO - Journal of Environmental Management

    JF - Journal of Environmental Management

    SN - 0301-4797

    IS - 8

    ER -