Integrating sociological and psychological perspectives on informal care: reply to Ungerson

Sheina Orbell, Nicholas Hopkins

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review


    In this response to Ungerson we present evidence to support the respresentativeness of the sample and argue that the exclusion of 'minimal' carers from caregiving research is not justified. Ungerson's arguments for the consideration of large scale social processes are addressed by examining the role of gender as a determinant or moderator of care outcomes. No support was found for a model in which care work satisfaction mediated associations between gender and willingness to care. Nor did gender moderate associations between care work and appraised impact. Gender was found to moderate associations between two of the seven measures of care work and willingness to care. These findings suggest that the impact of care work on carers is not gender specific, but that women experiencing similar levels of negative impact as men may feel greater obligation to continue caring.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)225-23
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 1993


    Dive into the research topics of 'Integrating sociological and psychological perspectives on informal care: reply to Ungerson'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this