Intergroup differentiation: Stereotyping as a function of status hierarchy

Nick Hopkins, Carolyn Rae

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The authors explored how negative intergroup comparisons affect intergroup differentiation. More specifically, they tested the prediction that the in-group's negative intergroup comparisons with a high-status group would result in more negative stereotyping of a lower status out-group. The authors elicited stereotypes of a lower status university in 2 conditions. In the Ist, the participants judged only the middle-ranking university in-group and a lower status university. In the 2nd, those judgments followed comparison with a higher status university. In the 2nd condition, there was an increased differentiation between the in-group and the lower status out-group because of the more negative stereotyping of the lower status out-group. This evidence of intergroup differentiation was found only on the dimension judged most important and along which the ingroup was negatively compared with the higher status group.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)323-333
    Number of pages11
    JournalJournal of Social Psychology
    Volume141
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2001

    Cite this

    @article{7728597694ff43df919db34c545f3c09,
    title = "Intergroup differentiation: Stereotyping as a function of status hierarchy",
    abstract = "The authors explored how negative intergroup comparisons affect intergroup differentiation. More specifically, they tested the prediction that the in-group's negative intergroup comparisons with a high-status group would result in more negative stereotyping of a lower status out-group. The authors elicited stereotypes of a lower status university in 2 conditions. In the Ist, the participants judged only the middle-ranking university in-group and a lower status university. In the 2nd, those judgments followed comparison with a higher status university. In the 2nd condition, there was an increased differentiation between the in-group and the lower status out-group because of the more negative stereotyping of the lower status out-group. This evidence of intergroup differentiation was found only on the dimension judged most important and along which the ingroup was negatively compared with the higher status group.",
    author = "Nick Hopkins and Carolyn Rae",
    year = "2001",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1080/00224540109600554",
    language = "English",
    volume = "141",
    pages = "323--333",
    journal = "Journal of Social Psychology",
    issn = "0022-4545",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "3",

    }

    Intergroup differentiation : Stereotyping as a function of status hierarchy. / Hopkins, Nick ; Rae, Carolyn.

    In: Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 141, No. 3, 06.2001, p. 323-333.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Intergroup differentiation

    T2 - Stereotyping as a function of status hierarchy

    AU - Hopkins, Nick

    AU - Rae, Carolyn

    PY - 2001/6

    Y1 - 2001/6

    N2 - The authors explored how negative intergroup comparisons affect intergroup differentiation. More specifically, they tested the prediction that the in-group's negative intergroup comparisons with a high-status group would result in more negative stereotyping of a lower status out-group. The authors elicited stereotypes of a lower status university in 2 conditions. In the Ist, the participants judged only the middle-ranking university in-group and a lower status university. In the 2nd, those judgments followed comparison with a higher status university. In the 2nd condition, there was an increased differentiation between the in-group and the lower status out-group because of the more negative stereotyping of the lower status out-group. This evidence of intergroup differentiation was found only on the dimension judged most important and along which the ingroup was negatively compared with the higher status group.

    AB - The authors explored how negative intergroup comparisons affect intergroup differentiation. More specifically, they tested the prediction that the in-group's negative intergroup comparisons with a high-status group would result in more negative stereotyping of a lower status out-group. The authors elicited stereotypes of a lower status university in 2 conditions. In the Ist, the participants judged only the middle-ranking university in-group and a lower status university. In the 2nd, those judgments followed comparison with a higher status university. In the 2nd condition, there was an increased differentiation between the in-group and the lower status out-group because of the more negative stereotyping of the lower status out-group. This evidence of intergroup differentiation was found only on the dimension judged most important and along which the ingroup was negatively compared with the higher status group.

    U2 - 10.1080/00224540109600554

    DO - 10.1080/00224540109600554

    M3 - Article

    VL - 141

    SP - 323

    EP - 333

    JO - Journal of Social Psychology

    JF - Journal of Social Psychology

    SN - 0022-4545

    IS - 3

    ER -