Investigating laboratory and everyday typing performances of blind users

Hugo Nicolau, Kyle Montague, Tiago Guerreiro, André Rodrigues, Vicki Hanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
71 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Over the last decade there have been numerous studies on touchscreen typing by blind people. However, there are no reports about blind users’ everyday typing performance and how it relates to laboratory settings. We conducted a longitudinal study involving five participants to investigate how blind users truly type on their smartphones. For 12 weeks, we collected field data, coupled with eight weekly laboratory sessions. This article provides a thorough analysis of everyday typing data and its relationship with controlled laboratory assessments. We improve state-of-the-art techniques to obtain intent from field data, and provide insights on real-world performance. Our findings show that users improve over time, even though it is at a slow rate. Substitutions are the most common type of error and have a significant impact on entry rates in both field and laboratory settings. Results show that participants are 1.3–2 times faster when typing during everyday tasks. On the other hand, they are less accurate. We finished by deriving some implications that should inform the design of a future virtual keyboard for nonvisual input. Moreover, findings should be of interest to keyboard designers and researchers looking to conduct field studies to understand everyday input performance.
Original languageEnglish
Article number4
Pages (from-to)4:1-4:26
Number of pages29
JournalACM Transactions on Accessible Computing
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Touch screens
Smartphones
Substitution reactions

Keywords

  • Blind
  • text-entry
  • input
  • laboratory
  • in-the-wild
  • everyday
  • touchscreen
  • mobile
  • behavior
  • performance
  • errors
  • longitudinal

Cite this

Nicolau, H., Montague, K., Guerreiro, T., Rodrigues, A., & Hanson, V. (2017). Investigating laboratory and everyday typing performances of blind users. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 10(1), 4:1-4:26. [4]. https://doi.org/10.1145/3046785
Nicolau, Hugo ; Montague, Kyle ; Guerreiro, Tiago ; Rodrigues, André ; Hanson, Vicki. / Investigating laboratory and everyday typing performances of blind users. In: ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing. 2017 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 4:1-4:26.
@article{f14b1686da0342099569e222e9b7421a,
title = "Investigating laboratory and everyday typing performances of blind users",
abstract = "Over the last decade there have been numerous studies on touchscreen typing by blind people. However, there are no reports about blind users’ everyday typing performance and how it relates to laboratory settings. We conducted a longitudinal study involving five participants to investigate how blind users truly type on their smartphones. For 12 weeks, we collected field data, coupled with eight weekly laboratory sessions. This article provides a thorough analysis of everyday typing data and its relationship with controlled laboratory assessments. We improve state-of-the-art techniques to obtain intent from field data, and provide insights on real-world performance. Our findings show that users improve over time, even though it is at a slow rate. Substitutions are the most common type of error and have a significant impact on entry rates in both field and laboratory settings. Results show that participants are 1.3–2 times faster when typing during everyday tasks. On the other hand, they are less accurate. We finished by deriving some implications that should inform the design of a future virtual keyboard for nonvisual input. Moreover, findings should be of interest to keyboard designers and researchers looking to conduct field studies to understand everyday input performance.",
keywords = "Blind, text-entry, input, laboratory, in-the-wild, everyday, touchscreen, mobile, behavior, performance, errors, longitudinal",
author = "Hugo Nicolau and Kyle Montague and Tiago Guerreiro and Andr{\'e} Rodrigues and Vicki Hanson",
note = "This work was partially supported by RIT’s Center for Accessibility and Inclusion Research, RCUK Hub: Inclusion in the Digital Economy (EP/G066019/1), and FCT (SFRH/BD/103935/2014, UID/CEC/00408/2013, UID/CEC/50021/2013).",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1145/3046785",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "4:1--4:26",
journal = "ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing",
issn = "1936-7228",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
number = "1",

}

Nicolau, H, Montague, K, Guerreiro, T, Rodrigues, A & Hanson, V 2017, 'Investigating laboratory and everyday typing performances of blind users', ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, vol. 10, no. 1, 4, pp. 4:1-4:26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3046785

Investigating laboratory and everyday typing performances of blind users. / Nicolau, Hugo; Montague, Kyle; Guerreiro, Tiago; Rodrigues, André; Hanson, Vicki.

In: ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, Vol. 10, No. 1, 4, 13.04.2017, p. 4:1-4:26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating laboratory and everyday typing performances of blind users

AU - Nicolau, Hugo

AU - Montague, Kyle

AU - Guerreiro, Tiago

AU - Rodrigues, André

AU - Hanson, Vicki

N1 - This work was partially supported by RIT’s Center for Accessibility and Inclusion Research, RCUK Hub: Inclusion in the Digital Economy (EP/G066019/1), and FCT (SFRH/BD/103935/2014, UID/CEC/00408/2013, UID/CEC/50021/2013).

PY - 2017/4/13

Y1 - 2017/4/13

N2 - Over the last decade there have been numerous studies on touchscreen typing by blind people. However, there are no reports about blind users’ everyday typing performance and how it relates to laboratory settings. We conducted a longitudinal study involving five participants to investigate how blind users truly type on their smartphones. For 12 weeks, we collected field data, coupled with eight weekly laboratory sessions. This article provides a thorough analysis of everyday typing data and its relationship with controlled laboratory assessments. We improve state-of-the-art techniques to obtain intent from field data, and provide insights on real-world performance. Our findings show that users improve over time, even though it is at a slow rate. Substitutions are the most common type of error and have a significant impact on entry rates in both field and laboratory settings. Results show that participants are 1.3–2 times faster when typing during everyday tasks. On the other hand, they are less accurate. We finished by deriving some implications that should inform the design of a future virtual keyboard for nonvisual input. Moreover, findings should be of interest to keyboard designers and researchers looking to conduct field studies to understand everyday input performance.

AB - Over the last decade there have been numerous studies on touchscreen typing by blind people. However, there are no reports about blind users’ everyday typing performance and how it relates to laboratory settings. We conducted a longitudinal study involving five participants to investigate how blind users truly type on their smartphones. For 12 weeks, we collected field data, coupled with eight weekly laboratory sessions. This article provides a thorough analysis of everyday typing data and its relationship with controlled laboratory assessments. We improve state-of-the-art techniques to obtain intent from field data, and provide insights on real-world performance. Our findings show that users improve over time, even though it is at a slow rate. Substitutions are the most common type of error and have a significant impact on entry rates in both field and laboratory settings. Results show that participants are 1.3–2 times faster when typing during everyday tasks. On the other hand, they are less accurate. We finished by deriving some implications that should inform the design of a future virtual keyboard for nonvisual input. Moreover, findings should be of interest to keyboard designers and researchers looking to conduct field studies to understand everyday input performance.

KW - Blind

KW - text-entry

KW - input

KW - laboratory

KW - in-the-wild

KW - everyday

KW - touchscreen

KW - mobile

KW - behavior

KW - performance

KW - errors

KW - longitudinal

U2 - 10.1145/3046785

DO - 10.1145/3046785

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 4:1-4:26

JO - ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing

JF - ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing

SN - 1936-7228

IS - 1

M1 - 4

ER -