TY - JOUR
T1 - Itemkonstruktion in sequenziellen mixed-methods-studien
T2 - Methodenbeschreibung anhand eines beispielprojekts
AU - Pentzek, Michael
AU - Wollny, Anja
AU - Herber, Oliver R.
AU - Porst, Rolf
AU - Icks, Andrea
AU - Abholz, Heinz-Harald
AU - Wilm, Stefan
N1 - Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012/12/1
Y1 - 2012/12/1
N2 - Background: One way of conducting mixed-methods studies is to apply qualitative techniques (e.g. interviews to explore a research question) with the subsequent use of questionnaires to quantify the results in a bigger sample (explorative sequential approach). There are no standards for the transformation of interview results into questionnaire items. Methods: With the help of a study example (characterisation of people with type 2 diabetes in good vs. poor metabolic control) we describe a step-by-step procedure, in which questionnaire items were selected and constructed in close correspondence to the categories of the interview analyses. Results: The process included: consulting experts, searching and appraising existing instruments, matching item wording with the interview results, modifying and developing items. As part of the mixed methods-design, in a further important qualitative step we conducted cognitive pretests: a first version of the item pool is presented to people belonging to the target population of the definitive instrument. A test administrator observes the completion and poses questions to the proband regarding comprehensibility and his choice of response options. Conclusions: The described process was time consuming, but opened out into an item pool with the potential of quantifying our interview results in a valid way. In sequential mixed-methods projects the time and cost expenditure for the development of a quantitative instrument has to be adequately considered. Expertise in questionnaire construction should be included in the project team.
AB - Background: One way of conducting mixed-methods studies is to apply qualitative techniques (e.g. interviews to explore a research question) with the subsequent use of questionnaires to quantify the results in a bigger sample (explorative sequential approach). There are no standards for the transformation of interview results into questionnaire items. Methods: With the help of a study example (characterisation of people with type 2 diabetes in good vs. poor metabolic control) we describe a step-by-step procedure, in which questionnaire items were selected and constructed in close correspondence to the categories of the interview analyses. Results: The process included: consulting experts, searching and appraising existing instruments, matching item wording with the interview results, modifying and developing items. As part of the mixed methods-design, in a further important qualitative step we conducted cognitive pretests: a first version of the item pool is presented to people belonging to the target population of the definitive instrument. A test administrator observes the completion and poses questions to the proband regarding comprehensibility and his choice of response options. Conclusions: The described process was time consuming, but opened out into an item pool with the potential of quantifying our interview results in a valid way. In sequential mixed-methods projects the time and cost expenditure for the development of a quantitative instrument has to be adequately considered. Expertise in questionnaire construction should be included in the project team.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872260950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84872260950
SN - 0937-6801
VL - 88
SP - 520
EP - 527
JO - Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin
JF - Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin
IS - 12
ER -