VivesDebate: A New Annotated Multilingual Corpus of Argumentation in a Debate Tournament

Ramon Ruiz-Dolz (Lead / Corresponding author), Montserrat Nofre, Mariona Taulé, Stella Heras, Ana Garcia-Fornes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The application of the latest Natural Language Processing breakthroughs in computational argumentation has shown promising results, which have raised the interest in this area of research. However, the available corpora with argumentative annotations are often limited to a very specific purpose or are not of adequate size to take advantage of state-of-the-art deep learning techniques (e.g., deep neural networks). In this paper, we present VivesDebate, a large, richly annotated and versatile professional debate corpus for computational argumentation research. The corpus has been created from 29 transcripts of a debate tournament in Catalan and has been machine-translated into Spanish and English. The annotation contains argumentative propositions, argumentative relations, debate interactions and professional evaluations of the arguments and argumentation. The presented corpus can be useful for research on a heterogeneous set of computational argumentation underlying tasks such as Argument Mining, Argument Analysis, Argument Evaluation or Argument Generation, among others. All this makes VivesDebate a valuable resource for computational argumentation research within the context of massive corpora aimed at Natural Language Processing tasks.
Original languageEnglish
Article number7160
Number of pages20
JournalApplied Sciences
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Aug 2021

Keywords

  • argumentation
  • corpus
  • debate
  • Natural Language Processing
  • Argument Mining
  • Argument Analysis
  • Argument Evaluation
  • Argument Generation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'VivesDebate: A New Annotated Multilingual Corpus of Argumentation in a Debate Tournament'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this