Japan and the Liberal Global-Order Project: A Time to Stop and Stare

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Authority and sovereignty disappeared in the West long ago, when power absorbed them both. The effects of this artifice have become particularly noticeable since the fall of the “bipolar” system. The post-political strategy pursued by universalized liberalism has indeed voided local government through an emphasis on global governance, in so endorsing the substitution of politics with administration. This paper argues that Japan is not affected by this totalizing phenomenon notwithstanding the official transplanting of libero-juridical policies and doctrines within its polity. Through a neorealist contextualization of the Japanese “authority-power” dichotomy and comparison between Western and Japanese “output” schemes of legitimation and accountability that will transcend the boundaries of purely cultural or socio-legal accounts, I contend that the reason why Japan is not part of the liberal scheme is that it is politically governed rather than managerially administered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-35
JournalAsian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal
Volume18
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Japan
political strategy
global governance
legitimation
liberalism
substitution
sovereignty
doctrine
responsibility
politics
time

Cite this

@article{88f208bc3840401f90866fd7bfbd0b52,
title = "Japan and the Liberal Global-Order Project: A Time to Stop and Stare",
abstract = "Authority and sovereignty disappeared in the West long ago, when power absorbed them both. The effects of this artifice have become particularly noticeable since the fall of the “bipolar” system. The post-political strategy pursued by universalized liberalism has indeed voided local government through an emphasis on global governance, in so endorsing the substitution of politics with administration. This paper argues that Japan is not affected by this totalizing phenomenon notwithstanding the official transplanting of libero-juridical policies and doctrines within its polity. Through a neorealist contextualization of the Japanese “authority-power” dichotomy and comparison between Western and Japanese “output” schemes of legitimation and accountability that will transcend the boundaries of purely cultural or socio-legal accounts, I contend that the reason why Japan is not part of the liberal scheme is that it is politically governed rather than managerially administered.",
author = "Luca Siliquini-Cinelli",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1--35",
journal = "Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal",
issn = "1541-244X",
number = "1",

}

Japan and the Liberal Global-Order Project : A Time to Stop and Stare. / Siliquini-Cinelli, Luca.

In: Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, 02.06.2017, p. 1-35.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Japan and the Liberal Global-Order Project

T2 - A Time to Stop and Stare

AU - Siliquini-Cinelli, Luca

PY - 2017/6/2

Y1 - 2017/6/2

N2 - Authority and sovereignty disappeared in the West long ago, when power absorbed them both. The effects of this artifice have become particularly noticeable since the fall of the “bipolar” system. The post-political strategy pursued by universalized liberalism has indeed voided local government through an emphasis on global governance, in so endorsing the substitution of politics with administration. This paper argues that Japan is not affected by this totalizing phenomenon notwithstanding the official transplanting of libero-juridical policies and doctrines within its polity. Through a neorealist contextualization of the Japanese “authority-power” dichotomy and comparison between Western and Japanese “output” schemes of legitimation and accountability that will transcend the boundaries of purely cultural or socio-legal accounts, I contend that the reason why Japan is not part of the liberal scheme is that it is politically governed rather than managerially administered.

AB - Authority and sovereignty disappeared in the West long ago, when power absorbed them both. The effects of this artifice have become particularly noticeable since the fall of the “bipolar” system. The post-political strategy pursued by universalized liberalism has indeed voided local government through an emphasis on global governance, in so endorsing the substitution of politics with administration. This paper argues that Japan is not affected by this totalizing phenomenon notwithstanding the official transplanting of libero-juridical policies and doctrines within its polity. Through a neorealist contextualization of the Japanese “authority-power” dichotomy and comparison between Western and Japanese “output” schemes of legitimation and accountability that will transcend the boundaries of purely cultural or socio-legal accounts, I contend that the reason why Japan is not part of the liberal scheme is that it is politically governed rather than managerially administered.

UR - http://blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/aplpj-volume-18-issue-1/

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1

EP - 35

JO - Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal

JF - Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal

SN - 1541-244X

IS - 1

ER -