Abstract
In this paper two formal dialectic systems are described, a persuasion protocol (PP0) and a negotiation protocol (NP0), together with a method for shifting from an instance of a persuasion dialogue to an instance of a negotiation dialogue. The rationale for this kind of shift is explored in the context of the fallacy of bargaining. Such a dialectical shift is proposed as a valuable way to enable the participants in an argumentative dialogue to proceed towards a practical settlement when they are otherwise unable to persuade each other.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Computational models of argument |
Subtitle of host publication | proceedings of COMMA 2006 |
Editors | Paul E. Dunne, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon |
Place of Publication | Amsterdam |
Publisher | IOS Press |
Pages | 235-246 |
Number of pages | 12 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781429419017, 9781607501954 |
ISBN (Print) | 1586036521, 9781586036522 |
Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Event | 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument - University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom Duration: 11 Sept 2006 → 12 Sept 2006 http://www.comma-conf.org/ |
Publication series
Name | Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications |
---|---|
Volume | 144 |
ISSN (Print) | 0922-6389 |
Conference
Conference | 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | COMMA 2006 |
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Liverpool |
Period | 11/09/06 → 12/09/06 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Argumentation
- Communication protocol
- Formal dialectical system
- Multiagent system
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Artificial Intelligence