Abstract
In this paper two formal dialectic systems are described, a persuasion protocol (PP0) and a negotiation protocol (NP0), together with a method for shifting from an instance of a persuasion dialogue to an instance of a negotiation dialogue. The rationale for this kind of shift is explored in the context of the fallacy of bargaining. Such a dialectical shift is proposed as a valuable way to enable the participants in an argumentative dialogue to proceed towards a practical settlement when they are otherwise unable to persuade each other.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Computational models of argument |
| Subtitle of host publication | proceedings of COMMA 2006 |
| Editors | Paul E. Dunne, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon |
| Place of Publication | Amsterdam |
| Publisher | IOS Press |
| Pages | 235-246 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781429419017, 9781607501954 |
| ISBN (Print) | 1586036521, 9781586036522 |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
| Event | 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument - University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom Duration: 11 Sept 2006 → 12 Sept 2006 http://www.comma-conf.org/ |
Publication series
| Name | Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications |
|---|---|
| Volume | 144 |
| ISSN (Print) | 0922-6389 |
Conference
| Conference | 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | COMMA 2006 |
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | Liverpool |
| Period | 11/09/06 → 12/09/06 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- Argumentation
- Communication protocol
- Formal dialectical system
- Multiagent system
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Artificial Intelligence
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Knowing when to bargain: the roles of negotiation and persuasion in dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver