Legal Positivism as Tekhnē: Postnational Normative Ontology and the Positivist Effectual Temporality

Luca Siliquini-Cinelli (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

When discussing the nature and functioning of global and transnational modes of regulation, scholars embark upon what may be defined as ‘postnational normative ontology.’ While the debate on this subject has proved to be insightful from several perspectives of inquiry, global and transnational legal theorists have not concerned themselves with three fundamental interrogatives regarding the relationship between legal positivism, state law, and postnational regimes. These are: whether positivist theories of law are informed by a peculiar form of temporality; if so, what kind of temporality that is; and finally, whether such temporality also underpins the working logic of global and transnational regulatory dynamics. This theoretical shortage reveals a ‘meta-ontological’ difficulty, being meta-ontology the study of the questions with which ontology—even in its normative fashion—concerns itself. Using modern secularisation and social conventionalism as case studies, this chapter engages with this difficulty by taking the first step towards a postnational contextualisation of legal positivism’s temporality. In doing so, it argues that legal positivism is a technique of world-construction (tekhnē) in the sense that it interprets social facts constructively (i.e. it transcends them rationally, logically, and systematically) to tell what the (concept of) law is. Further, it shows that in producing (or positing) social facts, the positivist law-ascertaining method is never merely descriptive but always regulatory. Finally, it contends that legal positivism’s metaphysical and epistemological constructions are informed by an effectual (i.e. progressive and future-oriented) form of temporality which global and transnational legal theorists should start exploring. Uncovering the meta-ontological dynamics which inform the conceptualisation and functioning of modern (i.e. positivist) law will, in turn, help scholars reflect on how the performativity of postnational regulatory mechanisms is theorised and operationalised.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLegal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age
EditorsLuca Siliquini-Cinelli
Place of PublicationSwitzerland
PublisherSpringer
Chapter5
Pages123-154
Number of pages32
ISBN (Electronic)9783030247058
ISBN (Print)9783030247041
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Publication series

NameLaw and Philosophy Library
PublisherSpringer
Volume131
ISSN (Print)1572-4395
ISSN (Electronic)2215-0315

Fingerprint

legal positivism
ontology
Law
conventionalism
secularization
state law
shortage
regime
regulation

Keywords

  • Postnational normative ontology
  • Legal positivism
  • Progressive and future-oriented temprality
  • Secularisation
  • Social conventionalism

Cite this

Siliquini-Cinelli, L. (2019). Legal Positivism as Tekhnē: Postnational Normative Ontology and the Positivist Effectual Temporality. In L. Siliquini-Cinelli (Ed.), Legal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age (pp. 123-154). (Law and Philosophy Library; Vol. 131). Switzerland: Springer . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24705-8_5
Siliquini-Cinelli, Luca. / Legal Positivism as Tekhnē : Postnational Normative Ontology and the Positivist Effectual Temporality. Legal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age. editor / Luca Siliquini-Cinelli. Switzerland : Springer , 2019. pp. 123-154 (Law and Philosophy Library).
@inbook{20111963edbc4137a8a3a321d4207ad3,
title = "Legal Positivism as Tekhnē: Postnational Normative Ontology and the Positivist Effectual Temporality",
abstract = "When discussing the nature and functioning of global and transnational modes of regulation, scholars embark upon what may be defined as ‘postnational normative ontology.’ While the debate on this subject has proved to be insightful from several perspectives of inquiry, global and transnational legal theorists have not concerned themselves with three fundamental interrogatives regarding the relationship between legal positivism, state law, and postnational regimes. These are: whether positivist theories of law are informed by a peculiar form of temporality; if so, what kind of temporality that is; and finally, whether such temporality also underpins the working logic of global and transnational regulatory dynamics. This theoretical shortage reveals a ‘meta-ontological’ difficulty, being meta-ontology the study of the questions with which ontology—even in its normative fashion—concerns itself. Using modern secularisation and social conventionalism as case studies, this chapter engages with this difficulty by taking the first step towards a postnational contextualisation of legal positivism’s temporality. In doing so, it argues that legal positivism is a technique of world-construction (tekhnē) in the sense that it interprets social facts constructively (i.e. it transcends them rationally, logically, and systematically) to tell what the (concept of) law is. Further, it shows that in producing (or positing) social facts, the positivist law-ascertaining method is never merely descriptive but always regulatory. Finally, it contends that legal positivism’s metaphysical and epistemological constructions are informed by an effectual (i.e. progressive and future-oriented) form of temporality which global and transnational legal theorists should start exploring. Uncovering the meta-ontological dynamics which inform the conceptualisation and functioning of modern (i.e. positivist) law will, in turn, help scholars reflect on how the performativity of postnational regulatory mechanisms is theorised and operationalised.",
keywords = "Postnational normative ontology, Legal positivism, Progressive and future-oriented temprality, Secularisation, Social conventionalism",
author = "Luca Siliquini-Cinelli",
note = "Publisher-imposed embargo",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-24705-8_5",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783030247041",
series = "Law and Philosophy Library",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "123--154",
editor = "Luca Siliquini-Cinelli",
booktitle = "Legal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age",

}

Siliquini-Cinelli, L 2019, Legal Positivism as Tekhnē: Postnational Normative Ontology and the Positivist Effectual Temporality. in L Siliquini-Cinelli (ed.), Legal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age. Law and Philosophy Library, vol. 131, Springer , Switzerland, pp. 123-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24705-8_5

Legal Positivism as Tekhnē : Postnational Normative Ontology and the Positivist Effectual Temporality. / Siliquini-Cinelli, Luca (Lead / Corresponding author).

Legal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age. ed. / Luca Siliquini-Cinelli. Switzerland : Springer , 2019. p. 123-154 (Law and Philosophy Library; Vol. 131).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - Legal Positivism as Tekhnē

T2 - Postnational Normative Ontology and the Positivist Effectual Temporality

AU - Siliquini-Cinelli, Luca

N1 - Publisher-imposed embargo

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - When discussing the nature and functioning of global and transnational modes of regulation, scholars embark upon what may be defined as ‘postnational normative ontology.’ While the debate on this subject has proved to be insightful from several perspectives of inquiry, global and transnational legal theorists have not concerned themselves with three fundamental interrogatives regarding the relationship between legal positivism, state law, and postnational regimes. These are: whether positivist theories of law are informed by a peculiar form of temporality; if so, what kind of temporality that is; and finally, whether such temporality also underpins the working logic of global and transnational regulatory dynamics. This theoretical shortage reveals a ‘meta-ontological’ difficulty, being meta-ontology the study of the questions with which ontology—even in its normative fashion—concerns itself. Using modern secularisation and social conventionalism as case studies, this chapter engages with this difficulty by taking the first step towards a postnational contextualisation of legal positivism’s temporality. In doing so, it argues that legal positivism is a technique of world-construction (tekhnē) in the sense that it interprets social facts constructively (i.e. it transcends them rationally, logically, and systematically) to tell what the (concept of) law is. Further, it shows that in producing (or positing) social facts, the positivist law-ascertaining method is never merely descriptive but always regulatory. Finally, it contends that legal positivism’s metaphysical and epistemological constructions are informed by an effectual (i.e. progressive and future-oriented) form of temporality which global and transnational legal theorists should start exploring. Uncovering the meta-ontological dynamics which inform the conceptualisation and functioning of modern (i.e. positivist) law will, in turn, help scholars reflect on how the performativity of postnational regulatory mechanisms is theorised and operationalised.

AB - When discussing the nature and functioning of global and transnational modes of regulation, scholars embark upon what may be defined as ‘postnational normative ontology.’ While the debate on this subject has proved to be insightful from several perspectives of inquiry, global and transnational legal theorists have not concerned themselves with three fundamental interrogatives regarding the relationship between legal positivism, state law, and postnational regimes. These are: whether positivist theories of law are informed by a peculiar form of temporality; if so, what kind of temporality that is; and finally, whether such temporality also underpins the working logic of global and transnational regulatory dynamics. This theoretical shortage reveals a ‘meta-ontological’ difficulty, being meta-ontology the study of the questions with which ontology—even in its normative fashion—concerns itself. Using modern secularisation and social conventionalism as case studies, this chapter engages with this difficulty by taking the first step towards a postnational contextualisation of legal positivism’s temporality. In doing so, it argues that legal positivism is a technique of world-construction (tekhnē) in the sense that it interprets social facts constructively (i.e. it transcends them rationally, logically, and systematically) to tell what the (concept of) law is. Further, it shows that in producing (or positing) social facts, the positivist law-ascertaining method is never merely descriptive but always regulatory. Finally, it contends that legal positivism’s metaphysical and epistemological constructions are informed by an effectual (i.e. progressive and future-oriented) form of temporality which global and transnational legal theorists should start exploring. Uncovering the meta-ontological dynamics which inform the conceptualisation and functioning of modern (i.e. positivist) law will, in turn, help scholars reflect on how the performativity of postnational regulatory mechanisms is theorised and operationalised.

KW - Postnational normative ontology

KW - Legal positivism

KW - Progressive and future-oriented temprality

KW - Secularisation

KW - Social conventionalism

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-24705-8_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-24705-8_5

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9783030247041

T3 - Law and Philosophy Library

SP - 123

EP - 154

BT - Legal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age

A2 - Siliquini-Cinelli, Luca

PB - Springer

CY - Switzerland

ER -

Siliquini-Cinelli L. Legal Positivism as Tekhnē: Postnational Normative Ontology and the Positivist Effectual Temporality. In Siliquini-Cinelli L, editor, Legal Positivism in a Global and Transnational Age. Switzerland: Springer . 2019. p. 123-154. (Law and Philosophy Library). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24705-8_5