Let’s you do that: sharing the cognitive burdens of dialogue

E. G. Bard, Anne Anderson, Y. Chen, H. B. M. Nicholson, C. Havard

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Three accounts of common ground maintenance make different assumptions about speakers’ responsibilities regarding listener-privileged information. Duplicated responsibility requires each interlocutor to assimilate the other’s knowledge before designing appropriate utterances. Shared responsibility appeals to least collaborative effort [Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.], requiring each interlocutor to report her own privileged knowledge. Cognitive load [Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005b). The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition, 96(2), 127–142.] assumes duplicated responsibility curtailed by processing limitations, so that simpler cues to listener knowledge should be preferred. Three experiments track genuine gaze of instructors at simulated projected gaze of confederate followers whom they guide along a map route. Though instructors can correct off-route gaze, a simply interpretable cue to listener knowledge, they habitually rely on inaccurate, underspecified verbal feedback instead and begin corrections without first checking the follower’s gaze. Time pressure discourages corrections accompanied by gaze checking. The results argue for shared responsibility attributable to a limitation in capacity to seek and integrate listener knowledge.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)616-641
    Number of pages26
    JournalJournal of Memory and Language
    Volume57
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2007

    Keywords

    • Dialogue
    • Audience design
    • Common ground
    • Cognitive load
    • Least collaborative effort
    • Simulated gaze
    • Shared responsibility

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Let’s you do that: sharing the cognitive burdens of dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this