Making scientific concepts explicit through explanations: Simulations of a high-leverage practice in teacher education

Valeria M. Cabello (Lead / Corresponding author), Keith Topping

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is a current research interest into high-leverage teaching practices which are geared towards making concepts explicit to learners. Explanations are a common practice in science education for sharing and constructing meaning with students. However, current studies insufficiently articulate a framework for understanding pre-service teachers’ explanations; neither do they assess the practical criteria for development. This article documents various criteria for pre-service science teachers’ explanations as related to the cognitive science literature and their assessment in the context of an instrument designed for teacher education. A rubric was constructed which organized structural and supportive elements into three levels. A validation process is described, and its application in teacher education programs to detect possible patterns and changes in pre-service science teachers’ explanations. The results show the explanation strengths of pre-service teachers working with examples, graphs and images. However, difficulties were found in using and improving analogies, metaphors, and models, and also approaching mis-conceptions as a learning opportunity. Theoretical and practical issues are discussed from a cognitive perspective. We conclude that the signaling implications of using rubrics sensitive to progress-monitoring during teacher education for high-leverage teaching practices give opportunities to simulate and rehearse practices that are highly conducive to learning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-48
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

simulation
teacher
education
science
teaching practice
research interest
learning
metaphor
monitoring
student

Keywords

  • Explanation
  • Simulations
  • High-leverage practice
  • Science Education

Cite this

@article{5286b30c3d484e5b864b4633aab34b33,
title = "Making scientific concepts explicit through explanations: Simulations of a high-leverage practice in teacher education",
abstract = "There is a current research interest into high-leverage teaching practices which are geared towards making concepts explicit to learners. Explanations are a common practice in science education for sharing and constructing meaning with students. However, current studies insufficiently articulate a framework for understanding pre-service teachers’ explanations; neither do they assess the practical criteria for development. This article documents various criteria for pre-service science teachers’ explanations as related to the cognitive science literature and their assessment in the context of an instrument designed for teacher education. A rubric was constructed which organized structural and supportive elements into three levels. A validation process is described, and its application in teacher education programs to detect possible patterns and changes in pre-service science teachers’ explanations. The results show the explanation strengths of pre-service teachers working with examples, graphs and images. However, difficulties were found in using and improving analogies, metaphors, and models, and also approaching mis-conceptions as a learning opportunity. Theoretical and practical issues are discussed from a cognitive perspective. We conclude that the signaling implications of using rubrics sensitive to progress-monitoring during teacher education for high-leverage teaching practices give opportunities to simulate and rehearse practices that are highly conducive to learning.",
keywords = "Explanation, Simulations, High-leverage practice, Science Education",
author = "Cabello, {Valeria M.} and Keith Topping",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "23",
doi = "10.5937/ijcrsee1803035C",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "35--48",
journal = "International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education",
issn = "2334-847X",
number = "3",

}

Making scientific concepts explicit through explanations: Simulations of a high-leverage practice in teacher education. / Cabello, Valeria M. (Lead / Corresponding author); Topping, Keith.

In: International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, Vol. 6, No. 3, 23.11.2018, p. 35-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making scientific concepts explicit through explanations: Simulations of a high-leverage practice in teacher education

AU - Cabello, Valeria M.

AU - Topping, Keith

PY - 2018/11/23

Y1 - 2018/11/23

N2 - There is a current research interest into high-leverage teaching practices which are geared towards making concepts explicit to learners. Explanations are a common practice in science education for sharing and constructing meaning with students. However, current studies insufficiently articulate a framework for understanding pre-service teachers’ explanations; neither do they assess the practical criteria for development. This article documents various criteria for pre-service science teachers’ explanations as related to the cognitive science literature and their assessment in the context of an instrument designed for teacher education. A rubric was constructed which organized structural and supportive elements into three levels. A validation process is described, and its application in teacher education programs to detect possible patterns and changes in pre-service science teachers’ explanations. The results show the explanation strengths of pre-service teachers working with examples, graphs and images. However, difficulties were found in using and improving analogies, metaphors, and models, and also approaching mis-conceptions as a learning opportunity. Theoretical and practical issues are discussed from a cognitive perspective. We conclude that the signaling implications of using rubrics sensitive to progress-monitoring during teacher education for high-leverage teaching practices give opportunities to simulate and rehearse practices that are highly conducive to learning.

AB - There is a current research interest into high-leverage teaching practices which are geared towards making concepts explicit to learners. Explanations are a common practice in science education for sharing and constructing meaning with students. However, current studies insufficiently articulate a framework for understanding pre-service teachers’ explanations; neither do they assess the practical criteria for development. This article documents various criteria for pre-service science teachers’ explanations as related to the cognitive science literature and their assessment in the context of an instrument designed for teacher education. A rubric was constructed which organized structural and supportive elements into three levels. A validation process is described, and its application in teacher education programs to detect possible patterns and changes in pre-service science teachers’ explanations. The results show the explanation strengths of pre-service teachers working with examples, graphs and images. However, difficulties were found in using and improving analogies, metaphors, and models, and also approaching mis-conceptions as a learning opportunity. Theoretical and practical issues are discussed from a cognitive perspective. We conclude that the signaling implications of using rubrics sensitive to progress-monitoring during teacher education for high-leverage teaching practices give opportunities to simulate and rehearse practices that are highly conducive to learning.

KW - Explanation

KW - Simulations

KW - High-leverage practice

KW - Science Education

U2 - 10.5937/ijcrsee1803035C

DO - 10.5937/ijcrsee1803035C

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 35

EP - 48

JO - International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

JF - International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education

SN - 2334-847X

IS - 3

ER -