Abstract
Oxidative stress is detrimental to spermatozoa and is acknowledged to be a common pathology in infertile men. Antioxidant supplements, therefore, represent a logical therapeutic approach, although the recent Cochrane review recommends cautious interpretation of publications and findings to date. This commentary considers whether male fertility supplements have a place in current reproductive medicine practice. Importantly, although sperm selection for intracytoplasmic sperm injection is a common research theme, survey data show that men would prefer medication to achieve natural conception, rather than treatment to improve assisted reproductive technology (ART) success. A total of 27.1% (n = 112), 26.6% (n = 110) and 24.5% (n = 101) respondents indicated they (or their male partner) would undertake medical treatment to attempt natural conception for up to 6 months, 12 months and 2 years, respectively. A total of 63% indicated that they would be prepared to participate in a clinical trial and 57% would defer ART by 6 months to do so. This information represents the beginnings of a dialogue with patients and stakeholders and should be used to shape research efforts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 879-883 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Reproductive BioMedicine Online |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 3 Sept 2019 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - Dec 2019 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Reproductive Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Developmental Biology