TY - JOUR
T1 - Maltese translation and adaptation of champion's health belief model scale and the revised illness perception questionnaire for breast screening among maltese women
AU - Marmarà, Danika
AU - Marmarà, Vincent
AU - Hubbard, Gill
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Springer Publishing Company.
PY - 2017/1
Y1 - 2017/1
N2 - Background and Purpose: Translating, adapting, and piloting Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for Mammography Screening (CHBMS-MS) and Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) among Maltese women. Methods: The Maltese questionnaire (Maltese Breast Screening Questionnaire [MBSQ]) was developed through 9 steps. Bilingual women (n = 15) completed MBSQ at 2 time points. Results: During forwardbackward translations (Steps 1-4), 4 English controversial terms were raised. Twelve experts agreed on terminologies during adaptation process (Step 5). Following face validity (n = 6; Step 6), 3 items were deleted. Following reconciliation (Step 7) and proofreading (Step 8), MBSQ consisted of 121 items. Pilot testing (Step 9) showed positive correlation (CHBMS-MS = .87, IPQ-R 5 .85; p < .001); high Cronbach's alpha (CHBMS-MS 5 .93, IPQ-R = .92); overall acceptable internal consistency (CHBMS-MS = .69-.83, IPQ-R = .75-.93); and acceptable test-retest reliability correlations: CHBMS-MS (Maltese = .62-.76; English = .61-.84), IPQ-R (Maltese = .63-.82; English = .61-.91; p < .001). Conclusions: Maltese and English scale items demonstrated high reliability and validity preliminary values.
AB - Background and Purpose: Translating, adapting, and piloting Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for Mammography Screening (CHBMS-MS) and Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) among Maltese women. Methods: The Maltese questionnaire (Maltese Breast Screening Questionnaire [MBSQ]) was developed through 9 steps. Bilingual women (n = 15) completed MBSQ at 2 time points. Results: During forwardbackward translations (Steps 1-4), 4 English controversial terms were raised. Twelve experts agreed on terminologies during adaptation process (Step 5). Following face validity (n = 6; Step 6), 3 items were deleted. Following reconciliation (Step 7) and proofreading (Step 8), MBSQ consisted of 121 items. Pilot testing (Step 9) showed positive correlation (CHBMS-MS = .87, IPQ-R 5 .85; p < .001); high Cronbach's alpha (CHBMS-MS 5 .93, IPQ-R = .92); overall acceptable internal consistency (CHBMS-MS = .69-.83, IPQ-R = .75-.93); and acceptable test-retest reliability correlations: CHBMS-MS (Maltese = .62-.76; English = .61-.84), IPQ-R (Maltese = .63-.82; English = .61-.91; p < .001). Conclusions: Maltese and English scale items demonstrated high reliability and validity preliminary values.
KW - Breast cancer screening
KW - Champion's Health Belief Model Scale
KW - Reliability
KW - The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire
KW - Validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037621133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.486
DO - 10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.486
M3 - Article
C2 - 29268831
AN - SCOPUS:85037621133
SN - 1061-3749
VL - 25
SP - 486
EP - 503
JO - Journal of Nursing Measurement
JF - Journal of Nursing Measurement
IS - 3
ER -