Management control systems in Finnish technology companies: search for a typology of MCS mix

Erkki K. Laitinen, Tom Wingren, William A. Nixon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The purpose of the paper is to search for a typology of management control system mix (MCSM) in 110 Finnish technology firms. MCSM is considered as a portfolio of management control mechanisms. In a MCSM, single systems are implemented and changed as a package. Instead of analysing such single systems, this paper is focused on a mix (package) of such systems that forms a more natural entity of controls. These MCSMs are assumed different for firms with different organisational characteristics. The paper is organised as follows. First, hypotheses on the relationship between background (organisational) variables and the implementation of and changes in MCSMs are presented. Second, a postal survey of MCSs is performed and responded by 110 firms. Third, the proposed hypotheses are tested for each single MCS by simple statistical tests. Fourth, typologies of MCSM implementation and change are searched by the factor analysis to empirically find out typical combinations of MCSs. Fifth, the extracted hypotheses are tested for the factor scores associated with MCSMs. The analysis showed that there are four basic types of MCSMs for implementation and change. These types are associated with different mixes of MCSs and affected by different organisational variables. The MCSMs for change found by the factor analysis can be classified in the following control packages: value-based management systems (change), performance measurement and improvement systems (change), activity- and process-based management systems (change) and production planning systems (change). For implementation, the third mix was merely entitled as time- and activity-based management system (implementation) while all other MCSMs were similar. Of all the organisational variables, only the size of the organisation proved to be statistically significant for all the types (MCSMs).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)183-214
    Number of pages32
    JournalInternational Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation
    Volume1
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    Systems change
    Management control systems
    Organizational variables
    Management system
    Factor analysis
    Production planning
    Performance improvement
    Statistical tests
    Control mechanism
    System implementation
    Organizational characteristics
    Time-based management
    Performance measurement
    Management control
    Factor scores
    Postal survey
    Value-based management
    Activity-based management

    Keywords

    • Management control systems
    • Finland
    • Technology
    • Company management

    Cite this

    @article{d4d030d5a1f442efb3810b4aeb337087,
    title = "Management control systems in Finnish technology companies: search for a typology of MCS mix",
    abstract = "The purpose of the paper is to search for a typology of management control system mix (MCSM) in 110 Finnish technology firms. MCSM is considered as a portfolio of management control mechanisms. In a MCSM, single systems are implemented and changed as a package. Instead of analysing such single systems, this paper is focused on a mix (package) of such systems that forms a more natural entity of controls. These MCSMs are assumed different for firms with different organisational characteristics. The paper is organised as follows. First, hypotheses on the relationship between background (organisational) variables and the implementation of and changes in MCSMs are presented. Second, a postal survey of MCSs is performed and responded by 110 firms. Third, the proposed hypotheses are tested for each single MCS by simple statistical tests. Fourth, typologies of MCSM implementation and change are searched by the factor analysis to empirically find out typical combinations of MCSs. Fifth, the extracted hypotheses are tested for the factor scores associated with MCSMs. The analysis showed that there are four basic types of MCSMs for implementation and change. These types are associated with different mixes of MCSs and affected by different organisational variables. The MCSMs for change found by the factor analysis can be classified in the following control packages: value-based management systems (change), performance measurement and improvement systems (change), activity- and process-based management systems (change) and production planning systems (change). For implementation, the third mix was merely entitled as time- and activity-based management system (implementation) while all other MCSMs were similar. Of all the organisational variables, only the size of the organisation proved to be statistically significant for all the types (MCSMs).",
    keywords = "Management control systems, Finland, Technology, Company management",
    author = "Laitinen, {Erkki K.} and Tom Wingren and Nixon, {William A.}",
    note = "dc.publisher: Inderscience",
    year = "2004",
    doi = "10.1504/IJAAPE.2004.004765",
    language = "English",
    volume = "1",
    pages = "183--214",
    journal = "International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation",
    issn = "1740-8008",
    publisher = "Inderscience Publishers",
    number = "2",

    }

    Management control systems in Finnish technology companies: search for a typology of MCS mix. / Laitinen, Erkki K.; Wingren, Tom; Nixon, William A.

    In: International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2004, p. 183-214.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Management control systems in Finnish technology companies: search for a typology of MCS mix

    AU - Laitinen, Erkki K.

    AU - Wingren, Tom

    AU - Nixon, William A.

    N1 - dc.publisher: Inderscience

    PY - 2004

    Y1 - 2004

    N2 - The purpose of the paper is to search for a typology of management control system mix (MCSM) in 110 Finnish technology firms. MCSM is considered as a portfolio of management control mechanisms. In a MCSM, single systems are implemented and changed as a package. Instead of analysing such single systems, this paper is focused on a mix (package) of such systems that forms a more natural entity of controls. These MCSMs are assumed different for firms with different organisational characteristics. The paper is organised as follows. First, hypotheses on the relationship between background (organisational) variables and the implementation of and changes in MCSMs are presented. Second, a postal survey of MCSs is performed and responded by 110 firms. Third, the proposed hypotheses are tested for each single MCS by simple statistical tests. Fourth, typologies of MCSM implementation and change are searched by the factor analysis to empirically find out typical combinations of MCSs. Fifth, the extracted hypotheses are tested for the factor scores associated with MCSMs. The analysis showed that there are four basic types of MCSMs for implementation and change. These types are associated with different mixes of MCSs and affected by different organisational variables. The MCSMs for change found by the factor analysis can be classified in the following control packages: value-based management systems (change), performance measurement and improvement systems (change), activity- and process-based management systems (change) and production planning systems (change). For implementation, the third mix was merely entitled as time- and activity-based management system (implementation) while all other MCSMs were similar. Of all the organisational variables, only the size of the organisation proved to be statistically significant for all the types (MCSMs).

    AB - The purpose of the paper is to search for a typology of management control system mix (MCSM) in 110 Finnish technology firms. MCSM is considered as a portfolio of management control mechanisms. In a MCSM, single systems are implemented and changed as a package. Instead of analysing such single systems, this paper is focused on a mix (package) of such systems that forms a more natural entity of controls. These MCSMs are assumed different for firms with different organisational characteristics. The paper is organised as follows. First, hypotheses on the relationship between background (organisational) variables and the implementation of and changes in MCSMs are presented. Second, a postal survey of MCSs is performed and responded by 110 firms. Third, the proposed hypotheses are tested for each single MCS by simple statistical tests. Fourth, typologies of MCSM implementation and change are searched by the factor analysis to empirically find out typical combinations of MCSs. Fifth, the extracted hypotheses are tested for the factor scores associated with MCSMs. The analysis showed that there are four basic types of MCSMs for implementation and change. These types are associated with different mixes of MCSs and affected by different organisational variables. The MCSMs for change found by the factor analysis can be classified in the following control packages: value-based management systems (change), performance measurement and improvement systems (change), activity- and process-based management systems (change) and production planning systems (change). For implementation, the third mix was merely entitled as time- and activity-based management system (implementation) while all other MCSMs were similar. Of all the organisational variables, only the size of the organisation proved to be statistically significant for all the types (MCSMs).

    KW - Management control systems

    KW - Finland

    KW - Technology

    KW - Company management

    U2 - 10.1504/IJAAPE.2004.004765

    DO - 10.1504/IJAAPE.2004.004765

    M3 - Article

    VL - 1

    SP - 183

    EP - 214

    JO - International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation

    JF - International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation

    SN - 1740-8008

    IS - 2

    ER -