Managing caries: the need to close the gap between the evidence base and current practice

F. Schwendicke (Lead / Corresponding author), S. Doméjean, D Ricketts, M. Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)
479 Downloads (Pure)


Underpinned by a changing knowledge of the aetiology of caries and its sequelae, and assisted by established and advancing dental materials, there is growing evidence supporting less invasive management of dental caries based on the principles of minimal intervention dentistry. This narrative review assesses both the evidence and the adoption of less invasive caries management strategies and describes ways in which the gap between evidence and practice might be overcome. While there is increasing data supporting less invasive management of carious lesions, these are not standard in most dental practices worldwide. Usually, clinical studies focused on efficacy as outcome, and did not take into consideration the views and priorities of other stakeholders, such as primary care dentists, educators, patients and those financing services. Involving these stakeholders into study design and demonstrating the broader advantages of new management strategies might improve translation of research into practice. In theory, clinical dentists can rely on a growing evidence in cariology regarding less invasive management options. In practice, further factors seem to impede adoption of these strategies. Future research should address these factors by involving major stakeholders and investigating their prioritised outcomes to narrow or close the evidence gap.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)433-438
Number of pages6
JournalBritish Dental Journal
Issue number9
Early online date13 Nov 2015
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015


  • Dental caries
  • Dental restoration, Permanent
  • Evidence-based dentistry
  • Humans
  • Minimally invasive surgical procedures
  • Practice patterns, Dentists'


Dive into the research topics of 'Managing caries: the need to close the gap between the evidence base and current practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this