Managing the Early Modern Periphery

Highland Policy and the Highland Judicial Commissions, c.1692-c.1705

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    81 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Current understanding of Williamite Scotland tends to emphasise a few familiar themes, especially Jacobitism, famine and the Darien scheme. This provides an opaque and arguably skewed view of the period and nowhere is that clearer than in Highland policy, where historiographical focus on the Jacobite rising and the massacre of Glencoe has come at the expense of a fuller understanding of how William's government responded to the perennial ‘Highland problem’. This article attempts to tackle that gap through analysis of Williamite Highland policy after 1692, with a particular emphasis on its major initiative, the Highland Judicial Commission of 1694. Reconstructing the development, structure, workings and intellectual underpinnings of the commission, both on its own terms and in comparison to the earlier commission of the 1680s upon which it was based, it is argued that William's government emerged as a more authoritarian, domineering presence in the Highlands than its immediate predecessors. This, in turn, has broader implications, not just in terms of questioning recent revisionism about the Williamite regime in Scotland, but also about the nature of peripheral control and state formation in the early modern period.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)32-60
    JournalScottish Historical Review
    Volume96
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

    Fingerprint

    Highlands
    Government
    Scotland
    Opaque
    Jacobites
    Revisionism
    Questioning
    Famine
    1680s
    Massacre
    Jacobitism
    State Formation

    Cite this

    @article{6dff3a3ddb774f86b807d5b157708068,
    title = "Managing the Early Modern Periphery: Highland Policy and the Highland Judicial Commissions, c.1692-c.1705",
    abstract = "Current understanding of Williamite Scotland tends to emphasise a few familiar themes, especially Jacobitism, famine and the Darien scheme. This provides an opaque and arguably skewed view of the period and nowhere is that clearer than in Highland policy, where historiographical focus on the Jacobite rising and the massacre of Glencoe has come at the expense of a fuller understanding of how William's government responded to the perennial ‘Highland problem’. This article attempts to tackle that gap through analysis of Williamite Highland policy after 1692, with a particular emphasis on its major initiative, the Highland Judicial Commission of 1694. Reconstructing the development, structure, workings and intellectual underpinnings of the commission, both on its own terms and in comparison to the earlier commission of the 1680s upon which it was based, it is argued that William's government emerged as a more authoritarian, domineering presence in the Highlands than its immediate predecessors. This, in turn, has broader implications, not just in terms of questioning recent revisionism about the Williamite regime in Scotland, but also about the nature of peripheral control and state formation in the early modern period.",
    author = "Allan Kennedy",
    year = "2017",
    month = "4",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.3366/shr.2017.0313",
    language = "English",
    volume = "96",
    pages = "32--60",
    journal = "Scottish Historical Review",
    issn = "0036-9241",
    publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    Managing the Early Modern Periphery : Highland Policy and the Highland Judicial Commissions, c.1692-c.1705. / Kennedy, Allan.

    In: Scottish Historical Review, Vol. 96, No. 1, 01.04.2017, p. 32-60.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Managing the Early Modern Periphery

    T2 - Highland Policy and the Highland Judicial Commissions, c.1692-c.1705

    AU - Kennedy, Allan

    PY - 2017/4/1

    Y1 - 2017/4/1

    N2 - Current understanding of Williamite Scotland tends to emphasise a few familiar themes, especially Jacobitism, famine and the Darien scheme. This provides an opaque and arguably skewed view of the period and nowhere is that clearer than in Highland policy, where historiographical focus on the Jacobite rising and the massacre of Glencoe has come at the expense of a fuller understanding of how William's government responded to the perennial ‘Highland problem’. This article attempts to tackle that gap through analysis of Williamite Highland policy after 1692, with a particular emphasis on its major initiative, the Highland Judicial Commission of 1694. Reconstructing the development, structure, workings and intellectual underpinnings of the commission, both on its own terms and in comparison to the earlier commission of the 1680s upon which it was based, it is argued that William's government emerged as a more authoritarian, domineering presence in the Highlands than its immediate predecessors. This, in turn, has broader implications, not just in terms of questioning recent revisionism about the Williamite regime in Scotland, but also about the nature of peripheral control and state formation in the early modern period.

    AB - Current understanding of Williamite Scotland tends to emphasise a few familiar themes, especially Jacobitism, famine and the Darien scheme. This provides an opaque and arguably skewed view of the period and nowhere is that clearer than in Highland policy, where historiographical focus on the Jacobite rising and the massacre of Glencoe has come at the expense of a fuller understanding of how William's government responded to the perennial ‘Highland problem’. This article attempts to tackle that gap through analysis of Williamite Highland policy after 1692, with a particular emphasis on its major initiative, the Highland Judicial Commission of 1694. Reconstructing the development, structure, workings and intellectual underpinnings of the commission, both on its own terms and in comparison to the earlier commission of the 1680s upon which it was based, it is argued that William's government emerged as a more authoritarian, domineering presence in the Highlands than its immediate predecessors. This, in turn, has broader implications, not just in terms of questioning recent revisionism about the Williamite regime in Scotland, but also about the nature of peripheral control and state formation in the early modern period.

    U2 - 10.3366/shr.2017.0313

    DO - 10.3366/shr.2017.0313

    M3 - Article

    VL - 96

    SP - 32

    EP - 60

    JO - Scottish Historical Review

    JF - Scottish Historical Review

    SN - 0036-9241

    IS - 1

    ER -