Margaret Jane Kidnie: Shakespeare and the problem of adaptation

Pascale Aebischer, Jennifer Barnes

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

    Abstract

    Now that Shakespearean performance studies have come of age, the time has come to reassess the theoretical assumptions underpinning the field. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation is an important contribution to this critical reassessment, productively questioning the distinction between text and performance that so much criticism relies on. Informed by her editorial work, Kidnie, in her opening chapters, suggests that this opposition masks a more fundamental distinction, that between the ‘work’ and ‘adaptation’. Drawing on recent debates in textual studies and adaptation theory, and reviving the near-defunct terminology of 1980s pragmatic criticism and reader-response theory in a new context, Kidnie describes the ‘work’ as an ongoing process that is produced through text(s), performance(s) and various users (readers, audiences) who, at diverse historical moments, apply their notions of the Shakespearean ‘work’ to its time-bound incarnations. She explains: ‘Instead of the text itself coming to stand in place of the work, with performance assuming a second order, adaptive relation as a performance of the text, performance and text are both, in their different ways, instances of the work’ (p. 28).

    Kidnie's model is compelling because it lends itself to an investigation of moments at which the notion of the Shakespearean ‘work’ comes under pressure
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)647-648
    Number of pages2
    JournalReview of English Studies
    Volume60
    Issue number246
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

    Fingerprint

    performance
    criticism
    William Shakespeare
    technical language
    pragmatics
    opposition
    Criticism
    time
    Reader
    Reader Response
    Fundamental
    Questioning
    1980s
    Performance Study
    Incarnation
    Textual Studies
    Mask

    Cite this

    @article{89804a955ca346679479906da9af1fba,
    title = "Margaret Jane Kidnie: Shakespeare and the problem of adaptation",
    abstract = "Now that Shakespearean performance studies have come of age, the time has come to reassess the theoretical assumptions underpinning the field. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation is an important contribution to this critical reassessment, productively questioning the distinction between text and performance that so much criticism relies on. Informed by her editorial work, Kidnie, in her opening chapters, suggests that this opposition masks a more fundamental distinction, that between the ‘work’ and ‘adaptation’. Drawing on recent debates in textual studies and adaptation theory, and reviving the near-defunct terminology of 1980s pragmatic criticism and reader-response theory in a new context, Kidnie describes the ‘work’ as an ongoing process that is produced through text(s), performance(s) and various users (readers, audiences) who, at diverse historical moments, apply their notions of the Shakespearean ‘work’ to its time-bound incarnations. She explains: ‘Instead of the text itself coming to stand in place of the work, with performance assuming a second order, adaptive relation as a performance of the text, performance and text are both, in their different ways, instances of the work’ (p. 28).Kidnie's model is compelling because it lends itself to an investigation of moments at which the notion of the Shakespearean ‘work’ comes under pressure",
    author = "Pascale Aebischer and Jennifer Barnes",
    year = "2009",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1093/res/hgp035",
    language = "English",
    volume = "60",
    pages = "647--648",
    journal = "Review of English Studies",
    issn = "0034-6551",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "246",

    }

    Margaret Jane Kidnie : Shakespeare and the problem of adaptation. / Aebischer, Pascale; Barnes, Jennifer.

    In: Review of English Studies, Vol. 60, No. 246, 09.2009, p. 647-648.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Margaret Jane Kidnie

    T2 - Shakespeare and the problem of adaptation

    AU - Aebischer, Pascale

    AU - Barnes, Jennifer

    PY - 2009/9

    Y1 - 2009/9

    N2 - Now that Shakespearean performance studies have come of age, the time has come to reassess the theoretical assumptions underpinning the field. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation is an important contribution to this critical reassessment, productively questioning the distinction between text and performance that so much criticism relies on. Informed by her editorial work, Kidnie, in her opening chapters, suggests that this opposition masks a more fundamental distinction, that between the ‘work’ and ‘adaptation’. Drawing on recent debates in textual studies and adaptation theory, and reviving the near-defunct terminology of 1980s pragmatic criticism and reader-response theory in a new context, Kidnie describes the ‘work’ as an ongoing process that is produced through text(s), performance(s) and various users (readers, audiences) who, at diverse historical moments, apply their notions of the Shakespearean ‘work’ to its time-bound incarnations. She explains: ‘Instead of the text itself coming to stand in place of the work, with performance assuming a second order, adaptive relation as a performance of the text, performance and text are both, in their different ways, instances of the work’ (p. 28).Kidnie's model is compelling because it lends itself to an investigation of moments at which the notion of the Shakespearean ‘work’ comes under pressure

    AB - Now that Shakespearean performance studies have come of age, the time has come to reassess the theoretical assumptions underpinning the field. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation is an important contribution to this critical reassessment, productively questioning the distinction between text and performance that so much criticism relies on. Informed by her editorial work, Kidnie, in her opening chapters, suggests that this opposition masks a more fundamental distinction, that between the ‘work’ and ‘adaptation’. Drawing on recent debates in textual studies and adaptation theory, and reviving the near-defunct terminology of 1980s pragmatic criticism and reader-response theory in a new context, Kidnie describes the ‘work’ as an ongoing process that is produced through text(s), performance(s) and various users (readers, audiences) who, at diverse historical moments, apply their notions of the Shakespearean ‘work’ to its time-bound incarnations. She explains: ‘Instead of the text itself coming to stand in place of the work, with performance assuming a second order, adaptive relation as a performance of the text, performance and text are both, in their different ways, instances of the work’ (p. 28).Kidnie's model is compelling because it lends itself to an investigation of moments at which the notion of the Shakespearean ‘work’ comes under pressure

    U2 - 10.1093/res/hgp035

    DO - 10.1093/res/hgp035

    M3 - Book/Film/Article review

    VL - 60

    SP - 647

    EP - 648

    JO - Review of English Studies

    JF - Review of English Studies

    SN - 0034-6551

    IS - 246

    ER -