Measuring Complexity and Change in Human Rights

Todd Landman, Edzia Carvalho

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    265 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Empirical research in human rights has made enormous strides over the last three decades not only in the breadth and depth of human rights that are examined but also in the sophistication and array of the methods used in these studies. A review of these methods reveals the perennial struggle of researchers in the social sciences to develop and use valid and reliable measures. Moreover, human rights are specially bounded by a constellation of concepts that further complicate measurement – distinctions between process and outcome, principles and standards, rights and obligations, violation and protection, etc. In their previous work, the authors have proposed human rights measurement frameworks based on accepted international principles and standards. The authors will use these frameworks as guides to map the issues of measurement that human rights research has addressed since the last 1980s and to highlight the avenues for further enquiries in the field.
    Original languageEnglish
    PublisherCommittee on Concepts and Methods
    Number of pages34
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Publication series

    NamePolitical Concepts - Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series
    PublisherCommittee on Concepts and Methods
    No.39

    Fingerprint

    human rights
    empirical research
    obligation
    social science

    Cite this

    Landman, T., & Carvalho, E. (2009). Measuring Complexity and Change in Human Rights. (Political Concepts - Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series; No. 39). Committee on Concepts and Methods.
    Landman, Todd ; Carvalho, Edzia. / Measuring Complexity and Change in Human Rights. Committee on Concepts and Methods, 2009. (Political Concepts - Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series; 39).
    @techreport{3a10a2ca01cf4caeaa2b9f77519eec55,
    title = "Measuring Complexity and Change in Human Rights",
    abstract = "Empirical research in human rights has made enormous strides over the last three decades not only in the breadth and depth of human rights that are examined but also in the sophistication and array of the methods used in these studies. A review of these methods reveals the perennial struggle of researchers in the social sciences to develop and use valid and reliable measures. Moreover, human rights are specially bounded by a constellation of concepts that further complicate measurement – distinctions between process and outcome, principles and standards, rights and obligations, violation and protection, etc. In their previous work, the authors have proposed human rights measurement frameworks based on accepted international principles and standards. The authors will use these frameworks as guides to map the issues of measurement that human rights research has addressed since the last 1980s and to highlight the avenues for further enquiries in the field.",
    author = "Todd Landman and Edzia Carvalho",
    year = "2009",
    language = "English",
    series = "Political Concepts - Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series",
    publisher = "Committee on Concepts and Methods",
    number = "39",
    type = "WorkingPaper",
    institution = "Committee on Concepts and Methods",

    }

    Landman, T & Carvalho, E 2009 'Measuring Complexity and Change in Human Rights' Political Concepts - Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, no. 39, Committee on Concepts and Methods.

    Measuring Complexity and Change in Human Rights. / Landman, Todd; Carvalho, Edzia.

    Committee on Concepts and Methods, 2009. (Political Concepts - Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series; No. 39).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

    TY - UNPB

    T1 - Measuring Complexity and Change in Human Rights

    AU - Landman, Todd

    AU - Carvalho, Edzia

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - Empirical research in human rights has made enormous strides over the last three decades not only in the breadth and depth of human rights that are examined but also in the sophistication and array of the methods used in these studies. A review of these methods reveals the perennial struggle of researchers in the social sciences to develop and use valid and reliable measures. Moreover, human rights are specially bounded by a constellation of concepts that further complicate measurement – distinctions between process and outcome, principles and standards, rights and obligations, violation and protection, etc. In their previous work, the authors have proposed human rights measurement frameworks based on accepted international principles and standards. The authors will use these frameworks as guides to map the issues of measurement that human rights research has addressed since the last 1980s and to highlight the avenues for further enquiries in the field.

    AB - Empirical research in human rights has made enormous strides over the last three decades not only in the breadth and depth of human rights that are examined but also in the sophistication and array of the methods used in these studies. A review of these methods reveals the perennial struggle of researchers in the social sciences to develop and use valid and reliable measures. Moreover, human rights are specially bounded by a constellation of concepts that further complicate measurement – distinctions between process and outcome, principles and standards, rights and obligations, violation and protection, etc. In their previous work, the authors have proposed human rights measurement frameworks based on accepted international principles and standards. The authors will use these frameworks as guides to map the issues of measurement that human rights research has addressed since the last 1980s and to highlight the avenues for further enquiries in the field.

    M3 - Discussion paper

    T3 - Political Concepts - Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series

    BT - Measuring Complexity and Change in Human Rights

    PB - Committee on Concepts and Methods

    ER -

    Landman T, Carvalho E. Measuring Complexity and Change in Human Rights. Committee on Concepts and Methods. 2009. (Political Concepts - Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series; 39).