Measuring Inequality of Opportunity for the Backward Communities: Regional Evidence from the Indian Labour Market

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The affirmative action policy for socially and economically backward communities in employment has been a debated issue in India. In this context, this paper aims to analyze the level of inequality by distinguishing between ‘circumstance’ and ‘effort’ factors in the Roemer’s framework on equality of opportunity. We measure inequality of opportunities due to two circumstances: caste and religion. Our empirical analysis, at state-level, utilizes a recent household survey data, which provides information related to efforts as well as circumstances of workers. The paper estimated inequality in the labour market and then decomposed it to know the circumstances that cause income inequality. Our estimates indicated that inequality and inequality of opportunity is substantially higher in India. Specifically, the outcome of our analysis evidently indicated that the socially backward communities do have economically disadvantageous position in some of the Indian states. However, the degree of circumstances based on inequality varies to a great extent among the states. Therefore, we suggest that the country does not need a nation-level affirmative action policy instead a state-level policy could be more appropriate as the intensity of the problem differ significantly among the Indian states.

    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages25
    JournalSocial Indicators Research
    Early online date19 Jun 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Jun 2017

    Fingerprint

    equal opportunity
    labor market
    community
    evidence
    affirmative action
    India
    caste
    household survey
    equality
    Religion
    Labour Market
    Social Class
    worker
    income
    cause

    Keywords

    • Caste
    • India
    • Inequality
    • Inequality of opportunity
    • Religion

    Cite this

    @article{53a46fb1d10c4abdbd63ed4f677710ee,
    title = "Measuring Inequality of Opportunity for the Backward Communities: Regional Evidence from the Indian Labour Market",
    abstract = "The affirmative action policy for socially and economically backward communities in employment has been a debated issue in India. In this context, this paper aims to analyze the level of inequality by distinguishing between ‘circumstance’ and ‘effort’ factors in the Roemer’s framework on equality of opportunity. We measure inequality of opportunities due to two circumstances: caste and religion. Our empirical analysis, at state-level, utilizes a recent household survey data, which provides information related to efforts as well as circumstances of workers. The paper estimated inequality in the labour market and then decomposed it to know the circumstances that cause income inequality. Our estimates indicated that inequality and inequality of opportunity is substantially higher in India. Specifically, the outcome of our analysis evidently indicated that the socially backward communities do have economically disadvantageous position in some of the Indian states. However, the degree of circumstances based on inequality varies to a great extent among the states. Therefore, we suggest that the country does not need a nation-level affirmative action policy instead a state-level policy could be more appropriate as the intensity of the problem differ significantly among the Indian states.",
    keywords = "Caste, India, Inequality, Inequality of opportunity, Religion",
    author = "Chandan Sharma and Paramati, {Sudharshan Reddy}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "6",
    day = "19",
    doi = "10.1007/s11205-017-1676-3",
    language = "English",
    journal = "Social Indicators Research",
    issn = "0303-8300",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Measuring Inequality of Opportunity for the Backward Communities

    T2 - Regional Evidence from the Indian Labour Market

    AU - Sharma, Chandan

    AU - Paramati, Sudharshan Reddy

    PY - 2017/6/19

    Y1 - 2017/6/19

    N2 - The affirmative action policy for socially and economically backward communities in employment has been a debated issue in India. In this context, this paper aims to analyze the level of inequality by distinguishing between ‘circumstance’ and ‘effort’ factors in the Roemer’s framework on equality of opportunity. We measure inequality of opportunities due to two circumstances: caste and religion. Our empirical analysis, at state-level, utilizes a recent household survey data, which provides information related to efforts as well as circumstances of workers. The paper estimated inequality in the labour market and then decomposed it to know the circumstances that cause income inequality. Our estimates indicated that inequality and inequality of opportunity is substantially higher in India. Specifically, the outcome of our analysis evidently indicated that the socially backward communities do have economically disadvantageous position in some of the Indian states. However, the degree of circumstances based on inequality varies to a great extent among the states. Therefore, we suggest that the country does not need a nation-level affirmative action policy instead a state-level policy could be more appropriate as the intensity of the problem differ significantly among the Indian states.

    AB - The affirmative action policy for socially and economically backward communities in employment has been a debated issue in India. In this context, this paper aims to analyze the level of inequality by distinguishing between ‘circumstance’ and ‘effort’ factors in the Roemer’s framework on equality of opportunity. We measure inequality of opportunities due to two circumstances: caste and religion. Our empirical analysis, at state-level, utilizes a recent household survey data, which provides information related to efforts as well as circumstances of workers. The paper estimated inequality in the labour market and then decomposed it to know the circumstances that cause income inequality. Our estimates indicated that inequality and inequality of opportunity is substantially higher in India. Specifically, the outcome of our analysis evidently indicated that the socially backward communities do have economically disadvantageous position in some of the Indian states. However, the degree of circumstances based on inequality varies to a great extent among the states. Therefore, we suggest that the country does not need a nation-level affirmative action policy instead a state-level policy could be more appropriate as the intensity of the problem differ significantly among the Indian states.

    KW - Caste

    KW - India

    KW - Inequality

    KW - Inequality of opportunity

    KW - Religion

    U2 - 10.1007/s11205-017-1676-3

    DO - 10.1007/s11205-017-1676-3

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85021097891

    JO - Social Indicators Research

    JF - Social Indicators Research

    SN - 0303-8300

    ER -