Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are widely used for evaluating the care of patients with psychosis. Previous studies have reported a considerable overlap in the information captured by measures designed to assess different outcomes. This may impair the validity of PROs and makes an a priori choice of the most appropriate measure difficult when assessing treatment benefits for patients. We aimed to investigate the extent to which four widely established PROs [subjective quality of life (SQOL), needs for care, treatment satisfaction and the therapeutic relationship] provide distinct information independent from this overlap.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 277-289 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Psychological Medicine |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Applied Psychology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring patients' views: a bifactor model of distinct patient-reported outcomes in psychosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver