Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mechanistic insights into FMT for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: analysis of the STOP-Colitis trial

  • Mohammed Nabil Quraishi (Lead / Corresponding author)
  • , Catherine A. Moakes
  • , Mehmet Yalchin
  • , Claire Blackwell
  • , Jonathan Segal
  • , Natalie J. Ives
  • , Laura Magill
  • , Susan E. Manzoor
  • , Konstantinos Gerasimidis
  • , Christel McMullan
  • , Jonathan Mathers
  • , Richard Horniblow
  • , Shrushma Loi
  • , Manjinder Kaur
  • , Nicholas J. Loman
  • , Naveen Sharma
  • , Peter Hawkey
  • , Victoria McCune
  • , Joshua Quick
  • , Samuel Nicholls
  • Claire McMurray, Ben Nichols, Vaios Svolos, Sebastien Raguideau, Caroline Kerbiriou, Ye H. Oo, Andrew D. Beggs, Nicola Crees, Richard Hansen, Ailsa L. Hart, Daniel R. Gaya, Christopher Quince, Tariq H. Iqbal (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and Aims: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a promising therapy for ulcerative colitis, but variable responses and unclear mechanisms limit its efficacy. We aimed to compare nasogastric versus colonic FMT delivery and define the microbial and immunological changes associated with clinical response.

Methods: In this prospective, open-label, randomised pilot trial (STOP-Colitis), 30 adults with active ulcerative colitis were randomised to receive multi-dose FMT via nasogastric tube or colonoscopy with subsequent enemas. Key endpoints were clinical outcomes at week 8 and longitudinal multi-omic analyses of stool and biopsies to define changes in microbial composition (16S rRNA and shotgun metagenomics), short-chain fatty acids, mucosal T-cells, and host gene expression.

Results: Colonic FMT was superior to nasogastric delivery, with a higher clinical response rate at week 8 (75% [9/12] vs 25% [2/8]; RR 2·94, 95% CI 0·84-10·30-per protocol analysis). Response was underpinned by successful microbial engraftment, leading to significantly increased faecal microbial diversity and enrichment of SCFA-producing taxa, including Oscillospiraceae and Christensenellaceae. This correlated with reduced faecal calprotectin. Responders showed a significant increase in mucosal regulatory T cells (P = 0·01), with a concurrent decrease in Th17 (P = 0·03) and CD8 + T cells. This anti-inflammatory shift was confirmed by mucosal transcriptomics, which revealed upregulation of metabolic pathways and downregulation of proinflammatory defence pathways in responders. (Trial registration: ISRCTN13636129).

Conclusion: Colonic FMT is a more effective delivery route than nasogastric administration. Clinical response is driven by the engraftment of immunomodulatory bacteria that restore a healthy host-microbe dialogue, providing rationale for developing targeted microbial therapeutics.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberjjag006
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Crohn's and Colitis
Volume20
Issue number3
Early online date23 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Mar 2026

Keywords

  • fecal microbiota transplantation
  • ulcerative colitis
  • immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mechanistic insights into FMT for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: analysis of the STOP-Colitis trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this