Meeple Centred Design: A Heuristic Toolkit for Evaluating the Accessibility of Tabletop Games

Michael James Heron, Pauline Helen Belford, Hayley Reid, Michael Crabb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Evaluation of accessibility within a tabletop context is much more complicated than it is within a video game environment. There is a considerable amount of variation in game systems, game mechanisms, and interaction regimes. Games may be entirely verbal, or completely non-verbal. They might be real-time or turn based, or based on simultaneous actions. They can be competitive or co-operative, or shift from one to the other during a single game session. They might involve visual pattern recognition or force players to memorise game state without visual cues. They may involve touch, or smell. They might involve social deduction or betrayal. They can encompass all sensory faculties, in differing degrees. Almost all games have accessibility considerations that should be taken into account, but there is currently no comprehensive tool by which this can be done that encompasses the rich variety of tabletop gaming interaction metaphors. In this paper, the authors discuss the heuristic lens that is used by the Meeple Centred Design tabletop accessibility project. This is a tool that has been applied to one hundred and sixteen games to date, and the full results of these have been published for analysis and consideration within the wider tabletop gaming community.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-114
Number of pages18
JournalComputer Games Journal
Volume7
Issue number2
Early online date27 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Pattern recognition
Lenses

Keywords

  • Board games
  • Accessibility
  • Inclusion
  • Tabletop
  • Meeple Like Us
  • Universal access

Cite this

Heron, Michael James ; Belford, Pauline Helen ; Reid, Hayley ; Crabb, Michael. / Meeple Centred Design : A Heuristic Toolkit for Evaluating the Accessibility of Tabletop Games. In: Computer Games Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 97-114.
@article{a870776bb60240a1b5500f447d843e8c,
title = "Meeple Centred Design: A Heuristic Toolkit for Evaluating the Accessibility of Tabletop Games",
abstract = "Evaluation of accessibility within a tabletop context is much more complicated than it is within a video game environment. There is a considerable amount of variation in game systems, game mechanisms, and interaction regimes. Games may be entirely verbal, or completely non-verbal. They might be real-time or turn based, or based on simultaneous actions. They can be competitive or co-operative, or shift from one to the other during a single game session. They might involve visual pattern recognition or force players to memorise game state without visual cues. They may involve touch, or smell. They might involve social deduction or betrayal. They can encompass all sensory faculties, in differing degrees. Almost all games have accessibility considerations that should be taken into account, but there is currently no comprehensive tool by which this can be done that encompasses the rich variety of tabletop gaming interaction metaphors. In this paper, the authors discuss the heuristic lens that is used by the Meeple Centred Design tabletop accessibility project. This is a tool that has been applied to one hundred and sixteen games to date, and the full results of these have been published for analysis and consideration within the wider tabletop gaming community.",
keywords = "Board games, Accessibility, Inclusion, Tabletop, Meeple Like Us, Universal access",
author = "Heron, {Michael James} and Belford, {Pauline Helen} and Hayley Reid and Michael Crabb",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s40869-018-0057-8",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "97--114",
journal = "Computer Games Journal",
issn = "2052-773X",
number = "2",

}

Meeple Centred Design : A Heuristic Toolkit for Evaluating the Accessibility of Tabletop Games. / Heron, Michael James; Belford, Pauline Helen; Reid, Hayley; Crabb, Michael.

In: Computer Games Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, 06.2018, p. 97-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meeple Centred Design

T2 - A Heuristic Toolkit for Evaluating the Accessibility of Tabletop Games

AU - Heron, Michael James

AU - Belford, Pauline Helen

AU - Reid, Hayley

AU - Crabb, Michael

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - Evaluation of accessibility within a tabletop context is much more complicated than it is within a video game environment. There is a considerable amount of variation in game systems, game mechanisms, and interaction regimes. Games may be entirely verbal, or completely non-verbal. They might be real-time or turn based, or based on simultaneous actions. They can be competitive or co-operative, or shift from one to the other during a single game session. They might involve visual pattern recognition or force players to memorise game state without visual cues. They may involve touch, or smell. They might involve social deduction or betrayal. They can encompass all sensory faculties, in differing degrees. Almost all games have accessibility considerations that should be taken into account, but there is currently no comprehensive tool by which this can be done that encompasses the rich variety of tabletop gaming interaction metaphors. In this paper, the authors discuss the heuristic lens that is used by the Meeple Centred Design tabletop accessibility project. This is a tool that has been applied to one hundred and sixteen games to date, and the full results of these have been published for analysis and consideration within the wider tabletop gaming community.

AB - Evaluation of accessibility within a tabletop context is much more complicated than it is within a video game environment. There is a considerable amount of variation in game systems, game mechanisms, and interaction regimes. Games may be entirely verbal, or completely non-verbal. They might be real-time or turn based, or based on simultaneous actions. They can be competitive or co-operative, or shift from one to the other during a single game session. They might involve visual pattern recognition or force players to memorise game state without visual cues. They may involve touch, or smell. They might involve social deduction or betrayal. They can encompass all sensory faculties, in differing degrees. Almost all games have accessibility considerations that should be taken into account, but there is currently no comprehensive tool by which this can be done that encompasses the rich variety of tabletop gaming interaction metaphors. In this paper, the authors discuss the heuristic lens that is used by the Meeple Centred Design tabletop accessibility project. This is a tool that has been applied to one hundred and sixteen games to date, and the full results of these have been published for analysis and consideration within the wider tabletop gaming community.

KW - Board games

KW - Accessibility

KW - Inclusion

KW - Tabletop

KW - Meeple Like Us

KW - Universal access

U2 - 10.1007/s40869-018-0057-8

DO - 10.1007/s40869-018-0057-8

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 97

EP - 114

JO - Computer Games Journal

JF - Computer Games Journal

SN - 2052-773X

IS - 2

ER -