Meeting information needs to facilitate decision making

report cards for people with disabilities

Susan E. Palsbo, Thilo Kroll

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Several states within the United States offer low-income adults with disabilities a choice of health plans. No states issue comparative _report cards_ specifically for adults with disabilities. Objective to explore conceptualizations of quality, information needs, and report card preferences from the perspective of people with disabilities. Research design Eight focus group interviews were conducted in 2003. Existing report cards for California, Maryland, Michigan and Texas were shared for feedback. Subjects 34 women and 15 men with various behavioural, physical or sensory disabilities in Oregon, California, Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. Results: Quality was mostly defined in terms of choice and disability sensitivity of service providers. Respondents identified various obstacles to receiving appropriate health plan and service information. All beneficiaries were keenly interested in the comparative health plan report cards, but did not think the report cards provided enough pertinent information, especially with regard to provider ratings, accessibility, disability competence and reasons for participating in the Medicaid program Conclusions: Existing comparative report cards omit several major content domains important to people with disabilities. Organizations providing decision support to people with disabilities should cultivate novel avenues for distribution, such as food banks, libraries and places of worship.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)278-285
    Number of pages8
    JournalHealth Expectations
    Volume10
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Disabled Persons
    Decision Making
    Medicaid
    Health
    Focus Groups
    Mental Competency
    Libraries
    Health Services
    Research Design
    Organizations
    Interviews
    Food

    Cite this

    @article{17b21bdceb13445e840e682fe52b68aa,
    title = "Meeting information needs to facilitate decision making: report cards for people with disabilities",
    abstract = "Background: Several states within the United States offer low-income adults with disabilities a choice of health plans. No states issue comparative _report cards_ specifically for adults with disabilities. Objective to explore conceptualizations of quality, information needs, and report card preferences from the perspective of people with disabilities. Research design Eight focus group interviews were conducted in 2003. Existing report cards for California, Maryland, Michigan and Texas were shared for feedback. Subjects 34 women and 15 men with various behavioural, physical or sensory disabilities in Oregon, California, Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. Results: Quality was mostly defined in terms of choice and disability sensitivity of service providers. Respondents identified various obstacles to receiving appropriate health plan and service information. All beneficiaries were keenly interested in the comparative health plan report cards, but did not think the report cards provided enough pertinent information, especially with regard to provider ratings, accessibility, disability competence and reasons for participating in the Medicaid program Conclusions: Existing comparative report cards omit several major content domains important to people with disabilities. Organizations providing decision support to people with disabilities should cultivate novel avenues for distribution, such as food banks, libraries and places of worship.",
    author = "Palsbo, {Susan E.} and Thilo Kroll",
    note = "dc.publisher: Wiley-Blackwell",
    year = "2007",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00453.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "278--285",
    journal = "Health Expectations",
    issn = "1369-6513",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "3",

    }

    Meeting information needs to facilitate decision making : report cards for people with disabilities. / Palsbo, Susan E.; Kroll, Thilo.

    In: Health Expectations, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2007, p. 278-285.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Meeting information needs to facilitate decision making

    T2 - report cards for people with disabilities

    AU - Palsbo, Susan E.

    AU - Kroll, Thilo

    N1 - dc.publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

    PY - 2007

    Y1 - 2007

    N2 - Background: Several states within the United States offer low-income adults with disabilities a choice of health plans. No states issue comparative _report cards_ specifically for adults with disabilities. Objective to explore conceptualizations of quality, information needs, and report card preferences from the perspective of people with disabilities. Research design Eight focus group interviews were conducted in 2003. Existing report cards for California, Maryland, Michigan and Texas were shared for feedback. Subjects 34 women and 15 men with various behavioural, physical or sensory disabilities in Oregon, California, Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. Results: Quality was mostly defined in terms of choice and disability sensitivity of service providers. Respondents identified various obstacles to receiving appropriate health plan and service information. All beneficiaries were keenly interested in the comparative health plan report cards, but did not think the report cards provided enough pertinent information, especially with regard to provider ratings, accessibility, disability competence and reasons for participating in the Medicaid program Conclusions: Existing comparative report cards omit several major content domains important to people with disabilities. Organizations providing decision support to people with disabilities should cultivate novel avenues for distribution, such as food banks, libraries and places of worship.

    AB - Background: Several states within the United States offer low-income adults with disabilities a choice of health plans. No states issue comparative _report cards_ specifically for adults with disabilities. Objective to explore conceptualizations of quality, information needs, and report card preferences from the perspective of people with disabilities. Research design Eight focus group interviews were conducted in 2003. Existing report cards for California, Maryland, Michigan and Texas were shared for feedback. Subjects 34 women and 15 men with various behavioural, physical or sensory disabilities in Oregon, California, Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. Results: Quality was mostly defined in terms of choice and disability sensitivity of service providers. Respondents identified various obstacles to receiving appropriate health plan and service information. All beneficiaries were keenly interested in the comparative health plan report cards, but did not think the report cards provided enough pertinent information, especially with regard to provider ratings, accessibility, disability competence and reasons for participating in the Medicaid program Conclusions: Existing comparative report cards omit several major content domains important to people with disabilities. Organizations providing decision support to people with disabilities should cultivate novel avenues for distribution, such as food banks, libraries and places of worship.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00453.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00453.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 278

    EP - 285

    JO - Health Expectations

    JF - Health Expectations

    SN - 1369-6513

    IS - 3

    ER -