Memantine increases NMDA receptor level in the prefrontal cortex but fails to reverse apomorphine-induced conditioned place preference in rats

Ziphozethu Ndlazi, Oualid Abboussi, Musa Mabandla, Willie Daniels

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    182 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Studies have shown that inflammation and neurodegeneration may accompany the development of addiction to apomorphine and that the glutamate NMDA receptor antagonist, memantine, may be neuroprotective. The similarity between apomorphine and dopamine with regard to their chemical, pharmacological and toxicological properties provided a basis for investigating the mechanism of action of the former agent. In this study, we investigated whether memantine would suppress apomorphine-seeking behavior in rats subjected to apomorphine-induced place preference conditioning, through modulation of NMDA receptors in the prefrontal cortex. Repeated apomorphine (1 mg/kg) treatment induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and had no significant effect on NMDA receptor levels in the prefrontal cortex. Prior treatment with memantine (5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) increased the levels of NMDA receptors in the prefrontal cortex but did not suppress CPP induced by apomorphine. These data give further support to the addictive effect of apomorphine and demonstrate that blockade of NMDA receptors by memantine is unable to suppress apomorphine-seeking behavior.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)211-220
    Number of pages10
    JournalAIMS Neuroscience
    Volume5
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 21 Sept 2018

    Keywords

    • Apomorphine
    • Conditioned place preference
    • Memantine
    • NMDA receptors

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • General Neuroscience

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Memantine increases NMDA receptor level in the prefrontal cortex but fails to reverse apomorphine-induced conditioned place preference in rats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this