Mental health nurses' emotions, exposure to patient aggression, attitudes to and use of coercive measures: Ccross-sectional, correlational study

Rahul Jalil, Jorg W. Huber, Judith Sixsmith, Geoffrey L. Dickens (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Mental health nurses are exposed to patient aggression, and required to manage and de-escalate aggressive incidents; coercive measures such as restraint and seclusion should only be used as a last resort. An improved understanding of links between nurses’ exposure to aggression, attitudes to, and actual involvement in, coercive measures, and their emotions (anger, guilt, fear, fatigue, sadness), could inform preparation and education for prevention and management of violence.

Objectives: To identify relationships between mental health nurses’ exposure to patient aggression, their emotions, their attitudes towards coercive containment measures, and their involvement in incidents involving seclusion and restraint.

Design: Cross-sectional, correlational, observational study.

Settings: Low and medium secure wards for men and women with mental disorder in three secure mental health hospitals in England.

Participants: N = 68 Mental health nurses who were designated keyworkers for patients enrolled into a related study.

Methods: Participants completed a questionnaire battery comprising measures of their exposure to various types of aggression, their attitudes towards seclusion and restraint, and their emotions. Information about their involvement in restraint and/or restraint plus seclusion incidents was gathered for the three-month period pre- and post- their participation. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to test study hypotheses.

Results: Nurses who reported greater exposure to a related set of aggressive behaviours, mostly verbal in nature, which seemed personally derogatory, targeted, or humiliating, also reported higher levels of anger-related provocation. Exposure to mild and severe physical aggression was unrelated to nurses’ emotions. Nurses’ reported anger was significantly positively correlated with their endorsement of restraint as a management technique, but not with their actual involvement in restraint episodes. Significant differences in scores related to anger and fatigue, and to fatigue and guilt, between those involved/not involved in physical restraint and in physical restraint plus seclusion respectively were detected. In regression analyses, models comprising significant variables, but not the variables themselves, predicted involvement/non-involvement in coercive measures.

Conclusions: Verbal aggression which appears targeted, demeaning or humiliating is associated with higher experienced anger provocation. Nurses may benefit from interventions which aim to improve their skills and coping strategies for dealing with this specific aggressive behaviour. Nurse-reported anger predicted approval of coercive violence management interventions; this may have implications for staff deployment and support. However, anger did not predict actual involvement in such incidents. Possible explanations are that nurses experiencing anger are sufficiently self-aware to avoid involvement or that teams are successful in supporting colleagues who they perceive to be ‘at risk’. Future research priorities are considered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-138
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume75
Early online date31 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Aggression
Anger
Mental Health
Emotions
Nurses
Physical Restraint
Fatigue
Guilt
Violence
Regression Analysis
Verbal Behavior
Psychological Adaptation
Psychiatric Hospitals
Mental Disorders
England
Fear
Observational Studies
Linear Models
Logistic Models
Education

Keywords

  • Violence
  • Aggression
  • Anger
  • Restraint
  • Seclusion
  • Mental health
  • De-escalation
  • Emotion

Cite this

@article{23b2d6012da543ef87547a9c01d798e7,
title = "Mental health nurses' emotions, exposure to patient aggression, attitudes to and use of coercive measures: Ccross-sectional, correlational study",
abstract = "Background: Mental health nurses are exposed to patient aggression, and required to manage and de-escalate aggressive incidents; coercive measures such as restraint and seclusion should only be used as a last resort. An improved understanding of links between nurses’ exposure to aggression, attitudes to, and actual involvement in, coercive measures, and their emotions (anger, guilt, fear, fatigue, sadness), could inform preparation and education for prevention and management of violence.Objectives: To identify relationships between mental health nurses’ exposure to patient aggression, their emotions, their attitudes towards coercive containment measures, and their involvement in incidents involving seclusion and restraint.Design: Cross-sectional, correlational, observational study.Settings: Low and medium secure wards for men and women with mental disorder in three secure mental health hospitals in England.Participants: N = 68 Mental health nurses who were designated keyworkers for patients enrolled into a related study.Methods: Participants completed a questionnaire battery comprising measures of their exposure to various types of aggression, their attitudes towards seclusion and restraint, and their emotions. Information about their involvement in restraint and/or restraint plus seclusion incidents was gathered for the three-month period pre- and post- their participation. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to test study hypotheses.Results: Nurses who reported greater exposure to a related set of aggressive behaviours, mostly verbal in nature, which seemed personally derogatory, targeted, or humiliating, also reported higher levels of anger-related provocation. Exposure to mild and severe physical aggression was unrelated to nurses’ emotions. Nurses’ reported anger was significantly positively correlated with their endorsement of restraint as a management technique, but not with their actual involvement in restraint episodes. Significant differences in scores related to anger and fatigue, and to fatigue and guilt, between those involved/not involved in physical restraint and in physical restraint plus seclusion respectively were detected. In regression analyses, models comprising significant variables, but not the variables themselves, predicted involvement/non-involvement in coercive measures.Conclusions: Verbal aggression which appears targeted, demeaning or humiliating is associated with higher experienced anger provocation. Nurses may benefit from interventions which aim to improve their skills and coping strategies for dealing with this specific aggressive behaviour. Nurse-reported anger predicted approval of coercive violence management interventions; this may have implications for staff deployment and support. However, anger did not predict actual involvement in such incidents. Possible explanations are that nurses experiencing anger are sufficiently self-aware to avoid involvement or that teams are successful in supporting colleagues who they perceive to be ‘at risk’. Future research priorities are considered.",
keywords = "Violence, Aggression, Anger, Restraint, Seclusion, Mental health, De-escalation, Emotion",
author = "Rahul Jalil and Huber, {Jorg W.} and Judith Sixsmith and Dickens, {Geoffrey L.}",
note = "This study was part of author RJs PhD funded by St Andrew’s Healthcare and the University of Northampton.",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.07.018",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "130--138",
journal = "International Journal of Nursing Studies",
issn = "0020-7489",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Mental health nurses' emotions, exposure to patient aggression, attitudes to and use of coercive measures : Ccross-sectional, correlational study. / Jalil, Rahul ; Huber, Jorg W.; Sixsmith, Judith; Dickens, Geoffrey L. (Lead / Corresponding author).

In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Vol. 75, 10.2017, p. 130-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mental health nurses' emotions, exposure to patient aggression, attitudes to and use of coercive measures

T2 - Ccross-sectional, correlational study

AU - Jalil, Rahul

AU - Huber, Jorg W.

AU - Sixsmith, Judith

AU - Dickens, Geoffrey L.

N1 - This study was part of author RJs PhD funded by St Andrew’s Healthcare and the University of Northampton.

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Background: Mental health nurses are exposed to patient aggression, and required to manage and de-escalate aggressive incidents; coercive measures such as restraint and seclusion should only be used as a last resort. An improved understanding of links between nurses’ exposure to aggression, attitudes to, and actual involvement in, coercive measures, and their emotions (anger, guilt, fear, fatigue, sadness), could inform preparation and education for prevention and management of violence.Objectives: To identify relationships between mental health nurses’ exposure to patient aggression, their emotions, their attitudes towards coercive containment measures, and their involvement in incidents involving seclusion and restraint.Design: Cross-sectional, correlational, observational study.Settings: Low and medium secure wards for men and women with mental disorder in three secure mental health hospitals in England.Participants: N = 68 Mental health nurses who were designated keyworkers for patients enrolled into a related study.Methods: Participants completed a questionnaire battery comprising measures of their exposure to various types of aggression, their attitudes towards seclusion and restraint, and their emotions. Information about their involvement in restraint and/or restraint plus seclusion incidents was gathered for the three-month period pre- and post- their participation. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to test study hypotheses.Results: Nurses who reported greater exposure to a related set of aggressive behaviours, mostly verbal in nature, which seemed personally derogatory, targeted, or humiliating, also reported higher levels of anger-related provocation. Exposure to mild and severe physical aggression was unrelated to nurses’ emotions. Nurses’ reported anger was significantly positively correlated with their endorsement of restraint as a management technique, but not with their actual involvement in restraint episodes. Significant differences in scores related to anger and fatigue, and to fatigue and guilt, between those involved/not involved in physical restraint and in physical restraint plus seclusion respectively were detected. In regression analyses, models comprising significant variables, but not the variables themselves, predicted involvement/non-involvement in coercive measures.Conclusions: Verbal aggression which appears targeted, demeaning or humiliating is associated with higher experienced anger provocation. Nurses may benefit from interventions which aim to improve their skills and coping strategies for dealing with this specific aggressive behaviour. Nurse-reported anger predicted approval of coercive violence management interventions; this may have implications for staff deployment and support. However, anger did not predict actual involvement in such incidents. Possible explanations are that nurses experiencing anger are sufficiently self-aware to avoid involvement or that teams are successful in supporting colleagues who they perceive to be ‘at risk’. Future research priorities are considered.

AB - Background: Mental health nurses are exposed to patient aggression, and required to manage and de-escalate aggressive incidents; coercive measures such as restraint and seclusion should only be used as a last resort. An improved understanding of links between nurses’ exposure to aggression, attitudes to, and actual involvement in, coercive measures, and their emotions (anger, guilt, fear, fatigue, sadness), could inform preparation and education for prevention and management of violence.Objectives: To identify relationships between mental health nurses’ exposure to patient aggression, their emotions, their attitudes towards coercive containment measures, and their involvement in incidents involving seclusion and restraint.Design: Cross-sectional, correlational, observational study.Settings: Low and medium secure wards for men and women with mental disorder in three secure mental health hospitals in England.Participants: N = 68 Mental health nurses who were designated keyworkers for patients enrolled into a related study.Methods: Participants completed a questionnaire battery comprising measures of their exposure to various types of aggression, their attitudes towards seclusion and restraint, and their emotions. Information about their involvement in restraint and/or restraint plus seclusion incidents was gathered for the three-month period pre- and post- their participation. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to test study hypotheses.Results: Nurses who reported greater exposure to a related set of aggressive behaviours, mostly verbal in nature, which seemed personally derogatory, targeted, or humiliating, also reported higher levels of anger-related provocation. Exposure to mild and severe physical aggression was unrelated to nurses’ emotions. Nurses’ reported anger was significantly positively correlated with their endorsement of restraint as a management technique, but not with their actual involvement in restraint episodes. Significant differences in scores related to anger and fatigue, and to fatigue and guilt, between those involved/not involved in physical restraint and in physical restraint plus seclusion respectively were detected. In regression analyses, models comprising significant variables, but not the variables themselves, predicted involvement/non-involvement in coercive measures.Conclusions: Verbal aggression which appears targeted, demeaning or humiliating is associated with higher experienced anger provocation. Nurses may benefit from interventions which aim to improve their skills and coping strategies for dealing with this specific aggressive behaviour. Nurse-reported anger predicted approval of coercive violence management interventions; this may have implications for staff deployment and support. However, anger did not predict actual involvement in such incidents. Possible explanations are that nurses experiencing anger are sufficiently self-aware to avoid involvement or that teams are successful in supporting colleagues who they perceive to be ‘at risk’. Future research priorities are considered.

KW - Violence

KW - Aggression

KW - Anger

KW - Restraint

KW - Seclusion

KW - Mental health

KW - De-escalation

KW - Emotion

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.07.018

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.07.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 28797822

VL - 75

SP - 130

EP - 138

JO - International Journal of Nursing Studies

JF - International Journal of Nursing Studies

SN - 0020-7489

ER -