Metacognitive developments in word learning: mutual exclusivity and theory of mind

Cornelia Gollek (Lead / Corresponding author), Martin J. Doherty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
148 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study examines the flexibility with which children can use pragmatic information to determine word reference. Extensive previous research shows that children choose an unfamiliar object as referent of a novel name: the disambiguation effect. We added a pragmatic cue indirectly indicating a familiar object as intended referent. In three experiments, preschool children’s ability to take this cue into account was specifically associated with false belief understanding and the ability to produce familiar alternative names (e.g., rabbit, animal) for a given referent. The association was predicted by the hypothesis that all three tasks require an understanding of perspective (linguistic or mental). The findings indicate that perspectival understanding is required to take into account indirect pragmatic information to suspend the disambiguation effect. Implications for lexical principles and socio-pragmatic theories of word learning are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-69
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume148
Early online date22 Apr 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

Keywords

  • word learning
  • mutual exclusivity bias
  • disambiguation effect
  • theory of mind
  • alternative naming
  • pragmatics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Metacognitive developments in word learning: mutual exclusivity and theory of mind'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this