Micrococcal Nuclease Does Not Substantially Bias Nucleosome Mapping

James Allan, Ross M. Fraser, Tom Owen-Hughes, David Keszenman-Pereyra

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    50 Citations (Scopus)
    188 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    We have mapped sequence-directed nucleosome positioning on genomic DNA molecules using high-throughput sequencing. Chromatins, prepared by reconstitution with either chicken or frog histones, were separately digested to mononucleosomes using either micrococcal nuclease (MNase) or caspase-activated DNase (CAD). Both enzymes preferentially cleave internucleosomal (linker) DNA, although they do so by markedly different mechanisms. MNase has hitherto been very widely used to map nucleosomes, although concerns have been raised over its potential to introduce bias. Having identified the locations and quantified the strength of both the chicken or frog histone octamer binding sites on each DNA, the results obtained with the two enzymes were compared using a variety of criteria. Both enzymes displayed sequence specificity in their preferred cleavage sites, although the nature of this selectivity was distinct for the two enzymes. In addition, nucleosomes produced by CAD nuclease are 8-10 bp longer than those produced with MNase, with the CAD cleavage sites tending to be 4-5 bp further out from the nucleosomal dyad than the corresponding MNase cleavage sites. Despite these notable differences in cleavage behaviour, the two nucleases identified essentially equivalent patterns of nucleosome positioning sites on each of the DNAs tested, an observation that was independent of the histone type. These results indicate that biases in nucleosome positioning data collected using MNase are, under our conditions, not significant. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)152-164
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of Molecular Biology
    Volume417
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2012

    Cite this

    Allan, James ; Fraser, Ross M. ; Owen-Hughes, Tom ; Keszenman-Pereyra, David. / Micrococcal Nuclease Does Not Substantially Bias Nucleosome Mapping. In: Journal of Molecular Biology. 2012 ; Vol. 417, No. 3. pp. 152-164.
    @article{1b675c0f52454a64a4d5e97ae88dfaa0,
    title = "Micrococcal Nuclease Does Not Substantially Bias Nucleosome Mapping",
    abstract = "We have mapped sequence-directed nucleosome positioning on genomic DNA molecules using high-throughput sequencing. Chromatins, prepared by reconstitution with either chicken or frog histones, were separately digested to mononucleosomes using either micrococcal nuclease (MNase) or caspase-activated DNase (CAD). Both enzymes preferentially cleave internucleosomal (linker) DNA, although they do so by markedly different mechanisms. MNase has hitherto been very widely used to map nucleosomes, although concerns have been raised over its potential to introduce bias. Having identified the locations and quantified the strength of both the chicken or frog histone octamer binding sites on each DNA, the results obtained with the two enzymes were compared using a variety of criteria. Both enzymes displayed sequence specificity in their preferred cleavage sites, although the nature of this selectivity was distinct for the two enzymes. In addition, nucleosomes produced by CAD nuclease are 8-10 bp longer than those produced with MNase, with the CAD cleavage sites tending to be 4-5 bp further out from the nucleosomal dyad than the corresponding MNase cleavage sites. Despite these notable differences in cleavage behaviour, the two nucleases identified essentially equivalent patterns of nucleosome positioning sites on each of the DNAs tested, an observation that was independent of the histone type. These results indicate that biases in nucleosome positioning data collected using MNase are, under our conditions, not significant. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
    author = "James Allan and Fraser, {Ross M.} and Tom Owen-Hughes and David Keszenman-Pereyra",
    year = "2012",
    month = "3",
    day = "30",
    doi = "10.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.043",
    language = "English",
    volume = "417",
    pages = "152--164",
    journal = "Journal of Molecular Biology",
    issn = "0022-2836",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "3",

    }

    Micrococcal Nuclease Does Not Substantially Bias Nucleosome Mapping. / Allan, James; Fraser, Ross M.; Owen-Hughes, Tom; Keszenman-Pereyra, David.

    In: Journal of Molecular Biology, Vol. 417, No. 3, 30.03.2012, p. 152-164.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Micrococcal Nuclease Does Not Substantially Bias Nucleosome Mapping

    AU - Allan, James

    AU - Fraser, Ross M.

    AU - Owen-Hughes, Tom

    AU - Keszenman-Pereyra, David

    PY - 2012/3/30

    Y1 - 2012/3/30

    N2 - We have mapped sequence-directed nucleosome positioning on genomic DNA molecules using high-throughput sequencing. Chromatins, prepared by reconstitution with either chicken or frog histones, were separately digested to mononucleosomes using either micrococcal nuclease (MNase) or caspase-activated DNase (CAD). Both enzymes preferentially cleave internucleosomal (linker) DNA, although they do so by markedly different mechanisms. MNase has hitherto been very widely used to map nucleosomes, although concerns have been raised over its potential to introduce bias. Having identified the locations and quantified the strength of both the chicken or frog histone octamer binding sites on each DNA, the results obtained with the two enzymes were compared using a variety of criteria. Both enzymes displayed sequence specificity in their preferred cleavage sites, although the nature of this selectivity was distinct for the two enzymes. In addition, nucleosomes produced by CAD nuclease are 8-10 bp longer than those produced with MNase, with the CAD cleavage sites tending to be 4-5 bp further out from the nucleosomal dyad than the corresponding MNase cleavage sites. Despite these notable differences in cleavage behaviour, the two nucleases identified essentially equivalent patterns of nucleosome positioning sites on each of the DNAs tested, an observation that was independent of the histone type. These results indicate that biases in nucleosome positioning data collected using MNase are, under our conditions, not significant. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    AB - We have mapped sequence-directed nucleosome positioning on genomic DNA molecules using high-throughput sequencing. Chromatins, prepared by reconstitution with either chicken or frog histones, were separately digested to mononucleosomes using either micrococcal nuclease (MNase) or caspase-activated DNase (CAD). Both enzymes preferentially cleave internucleosomal (linker) DNA, although they do so by markedly different mechanisms. MNase has hitherto been very widely used to map nucleosomes, although concerns have been raised over its potential to introduce bias. Having identified the locations and quantified the strength of both the chicken or frog histone octamer binding sites on each DNA, the results obtained with the two enzymes were compared using a variety of criteria. Both enzymes displayed sequence specificity in their preferred cleavage sites, although the nature of this selectivity was distinct for the two enzymes. In addition, nucleosomes produced by CAD nuclease are 8-10 bp longer than those produced with MNase, with the CAD cleavage sites tending to be 4-5 bp further out from the nucleosomal dyad than the corresponding MNase cleavage sites. Despite these notable differences in cleavage behaviour, the two nucleases identified essentially equivalent patterns of nucleosome positioning sites on each of the DNAs tested, an observation that was independent of the histone type. These results indicate that biases in nucleosome positioning data collected using MNase are, under our conditions, not significant. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.043

    DO - 10.1016/j.jmb.2012.01.043

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 22310051

    VL - 417

    SP - 152

    EP - 164

    JO - Journal of Molecular Biology

    JF - Journal of Molecular Biology

    SN - 0022-2836

    IS - 3

    ER -