Misdirected by the gap

the relationship between inattentional blindness and attentional misdirection

Gustav Kuhn, Benjamin W. Tatler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In several of our articles we have drawn analogies between inattentional blindness paradigms and misdirection. Memmert (2010) however, has criticized this analogy and urged for caution in assuming too much of a close relationship between these two phenomena. Here we consider the points raised by Memmert and highlight some misunderstandings and omissions in his interpretation of our work, which substantially undermine his argument. Debating the similarities and differences between aspects of misdirection and inattentional blindness is valuable and has the potential to highlight the utility of these two phenomena. However, it is important not to be misdirected by subtle differences between particular instances of each phenomenon, at the expense of failing to detect the opportunities that these phenomena present for extending our understanding of attention and awareness. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)432-436
    Number of pages5
    JournalConsciousness and Cognition
    Volume20
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011

    Cite this

    @article{4272e71ed2de4162bc6b04d4e9266bb4,
    title = "Misdirected by the gap: the relationship between inattentional blindness and attentional misdirection",
    abstract = "In several of our articles we have drawn analogies between inattentional blindness paradigms and misdirection. Memmert (2010) however, has criticized this analogy and urged for caution in assuming too much of a close relationship between these two phenomena. Here we consider the points raised by Memmert and highlight some misunderstandings and omissions in his interpretation of our work, which substantially undermine his argument. Debating the similarities and differences between aspects of misdirection and inattentional blindness is valuable and has the potential to highlight the utility of these two phenomena. However, it is important not to be misdirected by subtle differences between particular instances of each phenomenon, at the expense of failing to detect the opportunities that these phenomena present for extending our understanding of attention and awareness. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
    author = "Gustav Kuhn and Tatler, {Benjamin W.}",
    year = "2011",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "432--436",
    journal = "Consciousness and Cognition",
    issn = "1053-8100",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "2",

    }

    Misdirected by the gap : the relationship between inattentional blindness and attentional misdirection. / Kuhn, Gustav; Tatler, Benjamin W.

    In: Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 20, No. 2, 06.2011, p. 432-436.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Misdirected by the gap

    T2 - the relationship between inattentional blindness and attentional misdirection

    AU - Kuhn, Gustav

    AU - Tatler, Benjamin W.

    PY - 2011/6

    Y1 - 2011/6

    N2 - In several of our articles we have drawn analogies between inattentional blindness paradigms and misdirection. Memmert (2010) however, has criticized this analogy and urged for caution in assuming too much of a close relationship between these two phenomena. Here we consider the points raised by Memmert and highlight some misunderstandings and omissions in his interpretation of our work, which substantially undermine his argument. Debating the similarities and differences between aspects of misdirection and inattentional blindness is valuable and has the potential to highlight the utility of these two phenomena. However, it is important not to be misdirected by subtle differences between particular instances of each phenomenon, at the expense of failing to detect the opportunities that these phenomena present for extending our understanding of attention and awareness. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    AB - In several of our articles we have drawn analogies between inattentional blindness paradigms and misdirection. Memmert (2010) however, has criticized this analogy and urged for caution in assuming too much of a close relationship between these two phenomena. Here we consider the points raised by Memmert and highlight some misunderstandings and omissions in his interpretation of our work, which substantially undermine his argument. Debating the similarities and differences between aspects of misdirection and inattentional blindness is valuable and has the potential to highlight the utility of these two phenomena. However, it is important not to be misdirected by subtle differences between particular instances of each phenomenon, at the expense of failing to detect the opportunities that these phenomena present for extending our understanding of attention and awareness. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.013

    DO - 10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.013

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 432

    EP - 436

    JO - Consciousness and Cognition

    JF - Consciousness and Cognition

    SN - 1053-8100

    IS - 2

    ER -