Mixed-methods evaluation of an educational intervention to change mental health nurses' attitudes to people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder

Geoffrey L Dickens (Lead / Corresponding author), Emma Lamont, Jo Mullen, Nadine MacArthur, Fiona J Stirling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and explore mental health nurses' responses to and experience of an educational intervention to improve attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Report findings are concordant with relevant EQUATOR guidelines (STROBE and COREQ).

BACKGROUND: Attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of BPD are poorer than for people with other diagnoses. There is limited evidence about what might improve this situation. One intervention with reportedly good effect uses an underlying biosocial model of BPD. No previous intervention has been co-produced with an expert by experience. We developed and delivered a 1-day intervention comprising these elements.

DESIGN: A mixed-methods design was used comprising prospective within-subjects cohort intervention and qualitative elements. Participants were mental health nursing staff working in inpatient and community settings in one NHS Board in Scotland, UK.

METHODS: Measurement of cognitive and emotional attitudes to people with a diagnosis of BPD at pre- and postintervention (N = 28) and at 4-month follow-up. Focus groups were used to explore participants' experiences of the intervention (N = 11).

RESULTS: Quantitative evaluation revealed some sustained changes consistent with expected attitudinal gains in relation to the perceived treatment characteristics of this group, the perception of their suicidal tendencies and negative attitudes in general. Qualitative findings revealed some hostility towards the underpinning biosocial model and positive appreciation for the involvement of an expert by experience.

CONCLUSIONS: Sustained benefits of an educational intervention for people working with people diagnosed with BPD in some but not all areas. Participants provided contrasting messages about what they think will be useful.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The study provides further evidence for incorporation of a biosocial model into staff training as well as the benefits of expert by experience co-production. Mental health nurses, however, believe that more well-resourced services are the key to improving care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2613-2623
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume28
Issue number13-14
Early online date4 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Attitude to Health
Borderline Personality Disorder
Mental Health
Nurses
Psychiatric Nursing
Hostility
Nursing Staff
Scotland
Focus Groups
Inpatients
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
  • Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
  • Humans
  • Inservice Training/methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Psychiatric Nursing/education
  • Qualitative Research
  • mixed methods
  • attitudes
  • mental health nurses
  • borderline personality disorder
  • pre–post-survey design
  • qualitative research

Cite this

@article{d29307a9a0464cc0a9bd8850c6b99025,
title = "Mixed-methods evaluation of an educational intervention to change mental health nurses' attitudes to people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder",
abstract = "AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and explore mental health nurses' responses to and experience of an educational intervention to improve attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Report findings are concordant with relevant EQUATOR guidelines (STROBE and COREQ).BACKGROUND: Attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of BPD are poorer than for people with other diagnoses. There is limited evidence about what might improve this situation. One intervention with reportedly good effect uses an underlying biosocial model of BPD. No previous intervention has been co-produced with an expert by experience. We developed and delivered a 1-day intervention comprising these elements.DESIGN: A mixed-methods design was used comprising prospective within-subjects cohort intervention and qualitative elements. Participants were mental health nursing staff working in inpatient and community settings in one NHS Board in Scotland, UK.METHODS: Measurement of cognitive and emotional attitudes to people with a diagnosis of BPD at pre- and postintervention (N = 28) and at 4-month follow-up. Focus groups were used to explore participants' experiences of the intervention (N = 11).RESULTS: Quantitative evaluation revealed some sustained changes consistent with expected attitudinal gains in relation to the perceived treatment characteristics of this group, the perception of their suicidal tendencies and negative attitudes in general. Qualitative findings revealed some hostility towards the underpinning biosocial model and positive appreciation for the involvement of an expert by experience.CONCLUSIONS: Sustained benefits of an educational intervention for people working with people diagnosed with BPD in some but not all areas. Participants provided contrasting messages about what they think will be useful.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The study provides further evidence for incorporation of a biosocial model into staff training as well as the benefits of expert by experience co-production. Mental health nurses, however, believe that more well-resourced services are the key to improving care.",
keywords = "Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis, Female, Focus Groups, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Inservice Training/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Nursing/education, Qualitative Research, mixed methods, attitudes, mental health nurses, borderline personality disorder, pre–post-survey design, qualitative research",
author = "Dickens, {Geoffrey L} and Emma Lamont and Jo Mullen and Nadine MacArthur and Stirling, {Fiona J}",
note = "Funding: Jo Mullen and Nadine MacArthur Abertay University {\circledC} 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.14847",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "2613--2623",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "13-14",

}

Mixed-methods evaluation of an educational intervention to change mental health nurses' attitudes to people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. / Dickens, Geoffrey L (Lead / Corresponding author); Lamont, Emma; Mullen, Jo; MacArthur, Nadine; Stirling, Fiona J.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 28, No. 13-14, 07.2019, p. 2613-2623.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mixed-methods evaluation of an educational intervention to change mental health nurses' attitudes to people diagnosed with borderline personality disorder

AU - Dickens, Geoffrey L

AU - Lamont, Emma

AU - Mullen, Jo

AU - MacArthur, Nadine

AU - Stirling, Fiona J

N1 - Funding: Jo Mullen and Nadine MacArthur Abertay University © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and explore mental health nurses' responses to and experience of an educational intervention to improve attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Report findings are concordant with relevant EQUATOR guidelines (STROBE and COREQ).BACKGROUND: Attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of BPD are poorer than for people with other diagnoses. There is limited evidence about what might improve this situation. One intervention with reportedly good effect uses an underlying biosocial model of BPD. No previous intervention has been co-produced with an expert by experience. We developed and delivered a 1-day intervention comprising these elements.DESIGN: A mixed-methods design was used comprising prospective within-subjects cohort intervention and qualitative elements. Participants were mental health nursing staff working in inpatient and community settings in one NHS Board in Scotland, UK.METHODS: Measurement of cognitive and emotional attitudes to people with a diagnosis of BPD at pre- and postintervention (N = 28) and at 4-month follow-up. Focus groups were used to explore participants' experiences of the intervention (N = 11).RESULTS: Quantitative evaluation revealed some sustained changes consistent with expected attitudinal gains in relation to the perceived treatment characteristics of this group, the perception of their suicidal tendencies and negative attitudes in general. Qualitative findings revealed some hostility towards the underpinning biosocial model and positive appreciation for the involvement of an expert by experience.CONCLUSIONS: Sustained benefits of an educational intervention for people working with people diagnosed with BPD in some but not all areas. Participants provided contrasting messages about what they think will be useful.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The study provides further evidence for incorporation of a biosocial model into staff training as well as the benefits of expert by experience co-production. Mental health nurses, however, believe that more well-resourced services are the key to improving care.

AB - AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and explore mental health nurses' responses to and experience of an educational intervention to improve attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD). Report findings are concordant with relevant EQUATOR guidelines (STROBE and COREQ).BACKGROUND: Attitudes towards people with a diagnosis of BPD are poorer than for people with other diagnoses. There is limited evidence about what might improve this situation. One intervention with reportedly good effect uses an underlying biosocial model of BPD. No previous intervention has been co-produced with an expert by experience. We developed and delivered a 1-day intervention comprising these elements.DESIGN: A mixed-methods design was used comprising prospective within-subjects cohort intervention and qualitative elements. Participants were mental health nursing staff working in inpatient and community settings in one NHS Board in Scotland, UK.METHODS: Measurement of cognitive and emotional attitudes to people with a diagnosis of BPD at pre- and postintervention (N = 28) and at 4-month follow-up. Focus groups were used to explore participants' experiences of the intervention (N = 11).RESULTS: Quantitative evaluation revealed some sustained changes consistent with expected attitudinal gains in relation to the perceived treatment characteristics of this group, the perception of their suicidal tendencies and negative attitudes in general. Qualitative findings revealed some hostility towards the underpinning biosocial model and positive appreciation for the involvement of an expert by experience.CONCLUSIONS: Sustained benefits of an educational intervention for people working with people diagnosed with BPD in some but not all areas. Participants provided contrasting messages about what they think will be useful.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The study provides further evidence for incorporation of a biosocial model into staff training as well as the benefits of expert by experience co-production. Mental health nurses, however, believe that more well-resourced services are the key to improving care.

KW - Adult

KW - Attitude of Health Personnel

KW - Borderline Personality Disorder/diagnosis

KW - Female

KW - Focus Groups

KW - Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

KW - Humans

KW - Inservice Training/methods

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Psychiatric Nursing/education

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - mixed methods

KW - attitudes

KW - mental health nurses

KW - borderline personality disorder

KW - pre–post-survey design

KW - qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063612414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.14847

DO - 10.1111/jocn.14847

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 2613

EP - 2623

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 13-14

ER -