Negotiating for survival: Balancing mission and money

Elisa Henderson (Lead / Corresponding author), Victoria Lambert

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)
    272 Downloads (Pure)


    The impetus for prioritising money over mission in charities is increasingly pertinent as public sector austerity progresses in the UK. Mid size charities – who are heavily reliant on grant funding - have experienced proportionately greater challenges to austerity than larger entities. A substantial part of accountability efforts in mid size charities are directed towards funders, where funder imposed frameworks and measures may direct charity attention away from social mission towards funder needs, causing mission drift. Four charity case studies and grant funder interviews were conducted to investigate how charities can pursue social mission in a challenging funding environment. This paper shows that charities can protect social mission despite high dependence on grant funding, but also provides evidence of susceptibility to mission drift in cases where the balance between money and mission changes. Charity accounting systems display notable funder influence. A resource dependence perspective is utilised to highlight the complexity in assessing dependence of charities in a challenging environment and demonstrates the extent of funder influence in accounting and performance systems in these charities. However, charities employ strategies to cope with external requirements, enabling them to retain mission focus.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)185-198
    Number of pages14
    JournalBritish Accounting Review
    Issue number2
    Early online date12 Dec 2017
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018


    • Resource dependence perspective
    • Charities
    • Grant funders
    • Mission drift


    Dive into the research topics of 'Negotiating for survival: Balancing mission and money'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this