Nerve block, nerve damage, and fluid injection pressure: overturning the myth

Graeme McLeod (Lead / Corresponding author), Miguel A. Reina

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)
    17 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Histological and micro-ultrasound evidence rebuffs deep-rooted views on the nature of nerve block, nerve damage, and injection pressure monitoring. We propose that the ideal position of the needle tip for nerve block is between the innermost circumneural fascial layer and outer epineurium, with local anaesthetic passing circumferentially through adipose tissue. Thin, circumferential, subepineural expansion that is invisible to the naked eye was identified using micro-ultrasound, and could account for variability of outcomes in clinical practice. Pressure monitoring cannot differentiate between intrafascicular and extrafascicular injection. High injection pressure only indicates intraneural extrafascicular spread, not intrafascicular spread, because it is not possible to inject into the stiff endoneurium in most human nerves.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1022-1026
    Number of pages5
    JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
    Volume132
    Issue number5
    Early online date4 Jan 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2024

    Keywords

    • anatomy
    • epineurium
    • histology
    • injection pressure
    • nerve block
    • ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Nerve block, nerve damage, and fluid injection pressure: overturning the myth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this