Noticing and helping the neglected child

Towards an international research agenda

Julie Taylor, Brigid Daniel, Jane Scott

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This systematic review examined the evidence on the extent to which practitioners are equipped to recognize and respond to the indications that a child's needs are likely to be, or are being neglected. This paper examines the methodological issues arising from the review. A systematic process of progressive filtering yielded 112 papers representing primary studies that inform the international research agenda for child neglect. A final dataset of 63 studies was of sufficient quality and usefulness for inclusion. The review raised a number of methodological issues of relevance for research in child protection in general, and on neglect in particular. Researchers and practitioners can benefit from an enhanced understanding of the issues that make neglect difficult to understand. Common issues were identified to inform future research. For example, there was a tendency for studies to use a range of proxy measures rather than direct observation of the outcome of interest, and a wide range of different outcome measures was used. Many of the studies were small scale or retrospective in design. Many studies conflated neglect and other forms of maltreatment, and it was often difficult to extract specific messages for neglect.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalChild and Family Social Work
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

    Fingerprint

    neglect
    Child Abuse
    Proxy
    Research
    Research Personnel
    Observation
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    child protection
    maltreatment
    indication
    inclusion
    evidence
    Datasets

    Cite this

    @article{7fa84e95e8e5403b85fb9564aeae84a7,
    title = "Noticing and helping the neglected child: Towards an international research agenda",
    abstract = "This systematic review examined the evidence on the extent to which practitioners are equipped to recognize and respond to the indications that a child's needs are likely to be, or are being neglected. This paper examines the methodological issues arising from the review. A systematic process of progressive filtering yielded 112 papers representing primary studies that inform the international research agenda for child neglect. A final dataset of 63 studies was of sufficient quality and usefulness for inclusion. The review raised a number of methodological issues of relevance for research in child protection in general, and on neglect in particular. Researchers and practitioners can benefit from an enhanced understanding of the issues that make neglect difficult to understand. Common issues were identified to inform future research. For example, there was a tendency for studies to use a range of proxy measures rather than direct observation of the outcome of interest, and a wide range of different outcome measures was used. Many of the studies were small scale or retrospective in design. Many studies conflated neglect and other forms of maltreatment, and it was often difficult to extract specific messages for neglect.",
    author = "Julie Taylor and Brigid Daniel and Jane Scott",
    note = "Early View (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue)",
    year = "2011",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00795.x",
    language = "English",
    journal = "Child and Family Social Work",
    issn = "1356-7500",
    publisher = "Wiley",

    }

    Noticing and helping the neglected child : Towards an international research agenda. / Taylor, Julie; Daniel, Brigid; Scott, Jane.

    In: Child and Family Social Work, 09.2011.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Noticing and helping the neglected child

    T2 - Towards an international research agenda

    AU - Taylor, Julie

    AU - Daniel, Brigid

    AU - Scott, Jane

    N1 - Early View (Online Version of Record published before inclusion in an issue)

    PY - 2011/9

    Y1 - 2011/9

    N2 - This systematic review examined the evidence on the extent to which practitioners are equipped to recognize and respond to the indications that a child's needs are likely to be, or are being neglected. This paper examines the methodological issues arising from the review. A systematic process of progressive filtering yielded 112 papers representing primary studies that inform the international research agenda for child neglect. A final dataset of 63 studies was of sufficient quality and usefulness for inclusion. The review raised a number of methodological issues of relevance for research in child protection in general, and on neglect in particular. Researchers and practitioners can benefit from an enhanced understanding of the issues that make neglect difficult to understand. Common issues were identified to inform future research. For example, there was a tendency for studies to use a range of proxy measures rather than direct observation of the outcome of interest, and a wide range of different outcome measures was used. Many of the studies were small scale or retrospective in design. Many studies conflated neglect and other forms of maltreatment, and it was often difficult to extract specific messages for neglect.

    AB - This systematic review examined the evidence on the extent to which practitioners are equipped to recognize and respond to the indications that a child's needs are likely to be, or are being neglected. This paper examines the methodological issues arising from the review. A systematic process of progressive filtering yielded 112 papers representing primary studies that inform the international research agenda for child neglect. A final dataset of 63 studies was of sufficient quality and usefulness for inclusion. The review raised a number of methodological issues of relevance for research in child protection in general, and on neglect in particular. Researchers and practitioners can benefit from an enhanced understanding of the issues that make neglect difficult to understand. Common issues were identified to inform future research. For example, there was a tendency for studies to use a range of proxy measures rather than direct observation of the outcome of interest, and a wide range of different outcome measures was used. Many of the studies were small scale or retrospective in design. Many studies conflated neglect and other forms of maltreatment, and it was often difficult to extract specific messages for neglect.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053435619&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00795.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00795.x

    M3 - Article

    JO - Child and Family Social Work

    JF - Child and Family Social Work

    SN - 1356-7500

    ER -