Numerical study of PPE source term errors in the incompressible SPH models

Qinqin Gui, Ping Dong, Songdong Shao (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent work by Gui et al. [13], an incompressible SPH model was presented that employs a mixed pressure Poisson equation (PPE) source term combining both the density-invariant and velocity divergence-free formulations. The present work intends to apply the model to a wider range of fluid impactsituations in order to quantify the numerical errors associated with different formulations of the PPE source term in incompressible SPH (ISPH) models. The good agreement achieved between the model predictions and the documented data is taken as a further demonstration that the mixed source term formulation can accurately predict the fluid impact pressures and forces, both in the magnitude and in the spatial and temporal patterns. Furthermore, an in-depth numerical analysis using either the pure density-invariant or velocity divergence-free formulation has revealed that the pure density-invariant formulation can lead to relatively large divergence errors while the velocity divergence-free formulation may cause relatively large density errors. As compared with these two approaches, the mixed source term formulation performs much better having the minimum total errors in all test cases. Although some recent studies found that the weakly compressible SPH models perform somewhat better than the incompressible SPH models in certain fluid impact problems, we have shown that this could be largely caused by the particular formulation of PPE source term in the previous ISPH models and a better formulation of the source term can significantly improve the accuracy of ISPH models. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)358-379
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
Volume77
Issue number6
Early online date18 Dec 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Feb 2015

Fingerprint

Poisson equation
Source Terms
Poisson's equation
Numerical Study
Formulation
Divergence-free
Model
Fluids
Fluid
Invariant
Numerical analysis
Prediction Model
Demonstrations
Numerical Analysis
Divergence
Quantify
Predict

Cite this

Gui, Qinqin ; Dong, Ping ; Shao, Songdong. / Numerical study of PPE source term errors in the incompressible SPH models. In: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 2015 ; Vol. 77, No. 6. pp. 358-379.
@article{cb960f0c4fe742bd81f09a3e7979b89d,
title = "Numerical study of PPE source term errors in the incompressible SPH models",
abstract = "In a recent work by Gui et al. [13], an incompressible SPH model was presented that employs a mixed pressure Poisson equation (PPE) source term combining both the density-invariant and velocity divergence-free formulations. The present work intends to apply the model to a wider range of fluid impactsituations in order to quantify the numerical errors associated with different formulations of the PPE source term in incompressible SPH (ISPH) models. The good agreement achieved between the model predictions and the documented data is taken as a further demonstration that the mixed source term formulation can accurately predict the fluid impact pressures and forces, both in the magnitude and in the spatial and temporal patterns. Furthermore, an in-depth numerical analysis using either the pure density-invariant or velocity divergence-free formulation has revealed that the pure density-invariant formulation can lead to relatively large divergence errors while the velocity divergence-free formulation may cause relatively large density errors. As compared with these two approaches, the mixed source term formulation performs much better having the minimum total errors in all test cases. Although some recent studies found that the weakly compressible SPH models perform somewhat better than the incompressible SPH models in certain fluid impact problems, we have shown that this could be largely caused by the particular formulation of PPE source term in the previous ISPH models and a better formulation of the source term can significantly improve the accuracy of ISPH models. Copyright {\circledC} 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
author = "Qinqin Gui and Ping Dong and Songdong Shao",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1002/fld.3985",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "358--379",
journal = "International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids",
issn = "0271-2091",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "6",

}

Numerical study of PPE source term errors in the incompressible SPH models. / Gui, Qinqin; Dong, Ping; Shao, Songdong (Lead / Corresponding author).

In: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Vol. 77, No. 6, 28.02.2015, p. 358-379.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical study of PPE source term errors in the incompressible SPH models

AU - Gui, Qinqin

AU - Dong, Ping

AU - Shao, Songdong

PY - 2015/2/28

Y1 - 2015/2/28

N2 - In a recent work by Gui et al. [13], an incompressible SPH model was presented that employs a mixed pressure Poisson equation (PPE) source term combining both the density-invariant and velocity divergence-free formulations. The present work intends to apply the model to a wider range of fluid impactsituations in order to quantify the numerical errors associated with different formulations of the PPE source term in incompressible SPH (ISPH) models. The good agreement achieved between the model predictions and the documented data is taken as a further demonstration that the mixed source term formulation can accurately predict the fluid impact pressures and forces, both in the magnitude and in the spatial and temporal patterns. Furthermore, an in-depth numerical analysis using either the pure density-invariant or velocity divergence-free formulation has revealed that the pure density-invariant formulation can lead to relatively large divergence errors while the velocity divergence-free formulation may cause relatively large density errors. As compared with these two approaches, the mixed source term formulation performs much better having the minimum total errors in all test cases. Although some recent studies found that the weakly compressible SPH models perform somewhat better than the incompressible SPH models in certain fluid impact problems, we have shown that this could be largely caused by the particular formulation of PPE source term in the previous ISPH models and a better formulation of the source term can significantly improve the accuracy of ISPH models. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - In a recent work by Gui et al. [13], an incompressible SPH model was presented that employs a mixed pressure Poisson equation (PPE) source term combining both the density-invariant and velocity divergence-free formulations. The present work intends to apply the model to a wider range of fluid impactsituations in order to quantify the numerical errors associated with different formulations of the PPE source term in incompressible SPH (ISPH) models. The good agreement achieved between the model predictions and the documented data is taken as a further demonstration that the mixed source term formulation can accurately predict the fluid impact pressures and forces, both in the magnitude and in the spatial and temporal patterns. Furthermore, an in-depth numerical analysis using either the pure density-invariant or velocity divergence-free formulation has revealed that the pure density-invariant formulation can lead to relatively large divergence errors while the velocity divergence-free formulation may cause relatively large density errors. As compared with these two approaches, the mixed source term formulation performs much better having the minimum total errors in all test cases. Although some recent studies found that the weakly compressible SPH models perform somewhat better than the incompressible SPH models in certain fluid impact problems, we have shown that this could be largely caused by the particular formulation of PPE source term in the previous ISPH models and a better formulation of the source term can significantly improve the accuracy of ISPH models. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84921521948&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Numerical+study+of+PPE+source+term+errors+in+the+incompressible+SPH+models&st2=&sid=1C5F75DAA9556F81BE5EC883C8DEDE37.N5T5nM1aaTEF8rE6yKCR3A%3a600&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=89&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28Numerical+study+of+PPE+source+term+errors+in+the+incompressible+SPH+models%29&relpos=0&citeCnt=1&searchTerm=

U2 - 10.1002/fld.3985

DO - 10.1002/fld.3985

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 358

EP - 379

JO - International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

JF - International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

SN - 0271-2091

IS - 6

ER -