TY - JOUR
T1 - On CSI and passive Wi-Fi radar for opportunistic physical activity recognition
AU - Li, Wenda
AU - Bocus, Mohammud Junaid
AU - Tang, Chong
AU - Piechocki, Robert J.
AU - Woodbridge, Karl
AU - Chetty, Kevin
N1 - Copyright:
© 2021 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
PY - 2021/7/27
Y1 - 2021/7/27
N2 - The use of Wi-Fi signals for human sensing has gained significant interest over the past decade. Such techniques provide affordable and reliable solutions for healthcare-focused events such as vital sign detection, prevention of falls and long-term monitoring of chronic diseases, among others. Currently, there are two major approaches for Wi-Fi sensing: (1) passive Wi-Fi radar (PWR) which uses well established techniques from bistatic radar, and channel state information (CSI) based wireless sensing (SENS) which exploits human-induced variations in the communication channel between a pair of transmitter and receiver. However, there has not been a comprehensive study to understand and compare the differences in terms of effectiveness and limitations in real-world deployment. In this paper, we present the fundamentals of the two systems with associated methodologies and signal processing. A thorough measurement campaign was carried out to evaluate the human activity detection performance of both systems. Experimental results show that SENS system provides better detection performance in a line-of-sight (LoS) condition, whereas PWR system performs better in a non-LoS (NLoS) setting. Furthermore, based on our findings, we recommend that future Wi-Fi sensing applications should leverage the advantages from both PWR and SENS systems.
AB - The use of Wi-Fi signals for human sensing has gained significant interest over the past decade. Such techniques provide affordable and reliable solutions for healthcare-focused events such as vital sign detection, prevention of falls and long-term monitoring of chronic diseases, among others. Currently, there are two major approaches for Wi-Fi sensing: (1) passive Wi-Fi radar (PWR) which uses well established techniques from bistatic radar, and channel state information (CSI) based wireless sensing (SENS) which exploits human-induced variations in the communication channel between a pair of transmitter and receiver. However, there has not been a comprehensive study to understand and compare the differences in terms of effectiveness and limitations in real-world deployment. In this paper, we present the fundamentals of the two systems with associated methodologies and signal processing. A thorough measurement campaign was carried out to evaluate the human activity detection performance of both systems. Experimental results show that SENS system provides better detection performance in a line-of-sight (LoS) condition, whereas PWR system performs better in a non-LoS (NLoS) setting. Furthermore, based on our findings, we recommend that future Wi-Fi sensing applications should leverage the advantages from both PWR and SENS systems.
KW - Passive Wi-Fi radar
KW - channel state information
KW - Doppler
KW - wireless sensing
KW - Hidden Markov models
KW - Wireless communication
KW - OFDM
KW - Sensors
KW - Wireless fidelity
KW - Wireless sensor networks
U2 - 10.1109/twc.2021.3098526
DO - 10.1109/twc.2021.3098526
M3 - Article
SN - 1536-1276
VL - 21
SP - 607
EP - 620
JO - IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
JF - IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
IS - 1
ER -