On dimensionality, measurement invariance and suitability of sum scores for the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7

Jan Stochl (Lead / Corresponding author), Eiko I. Fried, Jessica Fritz, Tim J. Croudace, Debra A. Russo, Clare Knight, Peter B. Jones, Jesús Perez

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    80 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In psychiatry, severity of mental health conditions and their change over time are usually measured via sum scores of items on psychometric scales. However, inferences from such scores can be biased if psychometric properties such as unidimensionality and temporal measurement invariance for instruments are not met. Here, we aimed to evaluate these properties for common measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire–9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment–7) in a large clinical sample (N = 22,362) undergoing psychotherapy. In addition, we tested consistency in dimensionality results across different methods (parallel analysis, factor analysis, explained common variance, the partial credit model, and the Mokken model). Results showed that while both Patient Health Questionnaire–9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment–7 are multidimensional instruments with highly correlated factors, there is justification for sum scores as measures of severity. Temporal measurement invariance across 10 therapy sessions was evaluated. Strict temporal measurement invariance was established in both scales, allowing researchers to compare sum scores as severity measures across time.

    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages12
    JournalAssessment
    Early online date3 Dec 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Dec 2020

    Keywords

    • dimensionality
    • measurement invariance
    • sum scores
    • PHQ-9
    • GAD-7

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On dimensionality, measurement invariance and suitability of sum scores for the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this