On Technological Ground: The Art of Torsten Lauschmann

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    150 Downloads (Pure)


    This essay considers the relationship between the work of contemporary artist Torsten Lauschmann and themes in a growing area of research: philosophy of technology. Themes considered include relations between technology and contemporary urban dwelling, technology and the “everyday”, and Heidegger’s problematic but canonical understanding of technology not as a set of “mere means” but as a “way of revealing.” I argue that Lauschmann’s art renders these themes relevant for our increasingly technologically mediated forms of everyday experience by engaging in a paradoxical practice of creating what McLuhan called “anti-environments.”
    Part one relates Lauschmann’s art to three concepts surfacing in McLuhan’s late work: “figure”, “ground”, and “anti-environment.” Part two relates Lauschmann’s art to Merleau-Ponty’s critique of photography in terms of the ontology of dynamic movement. Part three relates Lauschmann’s art to Heidegger, implying a form of “affective critique” that – by questioning the environmental conditions that constitute works of art – points beyond vexed aspects of Heidegger’s approach, such as its apparent pessimism and tendency to homogenize disparate technologies. The essay’s broader argument is that Lauschmann’s art, like the philosophical reflections to which it is related, is engaged in a practice of challenging settled common-sense notions regarding technologically mediated experience.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)138-170
    Number of pages33
    JournalEvental Aesthetics
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2015


    • Aesthetics
    • Philosophy of Technology
    • Torsten Lauschmann
    • Marshall McLuhan
    • Media art
    • Martin Heidegger
    • Phenomenology

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Philosophy


    Dive into the research topics of 'On Technological Ground: The Art of Torsten Lauschmann'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this