TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal feature integration in visual search
AU - Vincent, Benjamin T.
AU - Baddeley, Roland J.
AU - Troscianko, Tom
AU - Gilchrist, Iain D.
N1 - Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/5/15
Y1 - 2009/5/15
N2 - Despite embodying fundamentally different assumptions about attentional allocation, a wide range of popular models of attention include a max-of-outputs mechanism for selection. Within these models, attention is directed to the items with the most extreme-value along a perceptual dimension via, for example, a winner-take-all mechanism. From the detection theoretic approach, this MAX-observer can be optimal under specific situations, however in distracter heterogeneity manipulations or in natural visual scenes this is not always the case. We derive a Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP)-observer, which is optimal in both these situations. While it retains a form of the max-of-outputs mechanism, it is based on the maximum a posterior probability dimension, instead of a perceptual dimension. To test this model we investigated human visual search performance using a yes/no procedure while adding external orientation uncertainty to distracter elements. The results are much better fitted by the predictions of a MAP observer than a MAX observer. We conclude a max-like mechanism may well underlie the allocation of visual attention, but this is based upon a probability dimension, not a perceptual dimension.
AB - Despite embodying fundamentally different assumptions about attentional allocation, a wide range of popular models of attention include a max-of-outputs mechanism for selection. Within these models, attention is directed to the items with the most extreme-value along a perceptual dimension via, for example, a winner-take-all mechanism. From the detection theoretic approach, this MAX-observer can be optimal under specific situations, however in distracter heterogeneity manipulations or in natural visual scenes this is not always the case. We derive a Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP)-observer, which is optimal in both these situations. While it retains a form of the max-of-outputs mechanism, it is based on the maximum a posterior probability dimension, instead of a perceptual dimension. To test this model we investigated human visual search performance using a yes/no procedure while adding external orientation uncertainty to distracter elements. The results are much better fitted by the predictions of a MAP observer than a MAX observer. We conclude a max-like mechanism may well underlie the allocation of visual attention, but this is based upon a probability dimension, not a perceptual dimension.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65849359929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1167/9.5.15
DO - 10.1167/9.5.15
M3 - Article
C2 - 19757893
AN - SCOPUS:65849359929
SN - 1534-7362
VL - 9
JO - Journal of Vision
JF - Journal of Vision
IS - 5
M1 - 15
ER -