Optimal screening mammography reading volumes: evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme

E. Cornford; J. Reed; A. Murphy; R. Bennett; A. Evans

doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.09.014

Optimal screening mammography reading volumes: evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme

E. Cornford, J. Reed, A. Murphy, R. Bennett, A. Evans

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To assess real-life reader performance as a function of both volume of mammograms read and reading experience in a multicentre cohort. Materials and methods: Thirty-seven film readers from the East Midlands Breast Screening Programme had 3 years of consecutive screen reading results available for comparison. Markers of screening performance as the first film reader [cancer detection rates, small cancer detection rates, recall rates, positive predictive value of recall (PPV), and missed cancers] were compared with both volume of films read and years of film reading experience. For reading volume, readers were categorized according to film reading volume over the 3 year period:

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	103-107
Number of pages	5
Journal	Clinical Radiology
Volume	66
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2010.09.014
Publication status	Published - 2011

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.crad.2010.09.014

Cite this

@article{de10d0e249444f53a11f9af53e3a5328,

title = "Optimal screening mammography reading volumes: evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme",

abstract = "Aim: To assess real-life reader performance as a function of both volume of mammograms read and reading experience in a multicentre cohort. Materials and methods: Thirty-seven film readers from the East Midlands Breast Screening Programme had 3 years of consecutive screen reading results available for comparison. Markers of screening performance as the first film reader [cancer detection rates, small cancer detection rates, recall rates, positive predictive value of recall (PPV), and missed cancers] were compared with both volume of films read and years of film reading experience. For reading volume, readers were categorized according to film reading volume over the 3 year period: ",

author = "E. Cornford and J. Reed and A. Murphy and R. Bennett and A. Evans",

note = "MEDLINE{\textregistered} is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1016/j.crad.2010.09.014",

language = "English",

volume = "66",

pages = "103--107",

journal = "Clinical Radiology",

issn = "0009-9260",

publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal screening mammography reading volumes

T2 - evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme

AU - Cornford, E.

AU - Reed, J.

AU - Murphy, A.

AU - Bennett, R.

AU - Evans, A.

N1 - MEDLINE® is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Aim: To assess real-life reader performance as a function of both volume of mammograms read and reading experience in a multicentre cohort. Materials and methods: Thirty-seven film readers from the East Midlands Breast Screening Programme had 3 years of consecutive screen reading results available for comparison. Markers of screening performance as the first film reader [cancer detection rates, small cancer detection rates, recall rates, positive predictive value of recall (PPV), and missed cancers] were compared with both volume of films read and years of film reading experience. For reading volume, readers were categorized according to film reading volume over the 3 year period:

AB - Aim: To assess real-life reader performance as a function of both volume of mammograms read and reading experience in a multicentre cohort. Materials and methods: Thirty-seven film readers from the East Midlands Breast Screening Programme had 3 years of consecutive screen reading results available for comparison. Markers of screening performance as the first film reader [cancer detection rates, small cancer detection rates, recall rates, positive predictive value of recall (PPV), and missed cancers] were compared with both volume of films read and years of film reading experience. For reading volume, readers were categorized according to film reading volume over the 3 year period:

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651289419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.crad.2010.09.014

DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2010.09.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 21216324

SN - 0009-9260

VL - 66

SP - 103

EP - 107

JO - Clinical Radiology

JF - Clinical Radiology

IS - 2

ER -

Optimal screening mammography reading volumes: evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this