TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal screening mammography reading volumes
T2 - evidence from real life in the East Midlands region of the NHS Breast Screening Programme
AU - Cornford, E.
AU - Reed, J.
AU - Murphy, A.
AU - Bennett, R.
AU - Evans, A.
N1 - MEDLINE® is the source for the MeSH terms of this document.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Aim: To assess real-life reader performance as a function of both volume of mammograms read and reading experience in a multicentre cohort. Materials and methods: Thirty-seven film readers from the East Midlands Breast Screening Programme had 3 years of consecutive screen reading results available for comparison. Markers of screening performance as the first film reader [cancer detection rates, small cancer detection rates, recall rates, positive predictive value of recall (PPV), and missed cancers] were compared with both volume of films read and years of film reading experience. For reading volume, readers were categorized according to film reading volume over the 3 year period:
AB - Aim: To assess real-life reader performance as a function of both volume of mammograms read and reading experience in a multicentre cohort. Materials and methods: Thirty-seven film readers from the East Midlands Breast Screening Programme had 3 years of consecutive screen reading results available for comparison. Markers of screening performance as the first film reader [cancer detection rates, small cancer detection rates, recall rates, positive predictive value of recall (PPV), and missed cancers] were compared with both volume of films read and years of film reading experience. For reading volume, readers were categorized according to film reading volume over the 3 year period:
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78651289419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.crad.2010.09.014
DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2010.09.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 21216324
VL - 66
SP - 103
EP - 107
JO - Clinical Radiology
JF - Clinical Radiology
SN - 0009-9260
IS - 2
ER -