Organisational professionalism and moral courage: contradictory concepts in social work?

Jane Fenton (Lead / Corresponding author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

136 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper considers findings from a larger study that explored value tensions and ethical stress experienced by criminal justice social workers across Scotland (Fenton, 2015). The qualitative data from that study are revisited and comments are analysed in terms of themes indicative of ‘organisational professionalism,’ such as reliance on agency procedures, the importance of the role of managers and the redundancy of a working theoretical and ethical knowledge base (Evetts, 2003). Findings suggest that ‘organisational professionalism’ is insidiously becoming the social work professional practice framework. Dangers of adherence to such a framework are suggested, especially in terms of the difficulty it might cause for social workers to demonstrate ‘moral courage’ (Morley and Macfarlane, 2014, p346) in the face of the shift to neoliberal frames of reference and ubiquitous managerialism.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-215
Number of pages17
JournalCritical and Radical Social Work
Volume4
Issue number2
Early online date9 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

Fingerprint

social worker
social work
redundancy
justice
manager
cause
Values
professionalism

Keywords

  • Neoliberalism
  • Social work education
  • Professionalism

Cite this

@article{970b2f68e5e44a71a9c39c739d6464fd,
title = "Organisational professionalism and moral courage: contradictory concepts in social work?",
abstract = "This paper considers findings from a larger study that explored value tensions and ethical stress experienced by criminal justice social workers across Scotland (Fenton, 2015). The qualitative data from that study are revisited and comments are analysed in terms of themes indicative of ‘organisational professionalism,’ such as reliance on agency procedures, the importance of the role of managers and the redundancy of a working theoretical and ethical knowledge base (Evetts, 2003). Findings suggest that ‘organisational professionalism’ is insidiously becoming the social work professional practice framework. Dangers of adherence to such a framework are suggested, especially in terms of the difficulty it might cause for social workers to demonstrate ‘moral courage’ (Morley and Macfarlane, 2014, p346) in the face of the shift to neoliberal frames of reference and ubiquitous managerialism.",
keywords = "Neoliberalism, Social work education, Professionalism",
author = "Jane Fenton",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1332/204986016X14651166264156",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "199--215",
journal = "Critical and Radical Social Work",
issn = "2049-8608",
publisher = "Policy Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organisational professionalism and moral courage

T2 - contradictory concepts in social work?

AU - Fenton, Jane

PY - 2016/8

Y1 - 2016/8

N2 - This paper considers findings from a larger study that explored value tensions and ethical stress experienced by criminal justice social workers across Scotland (Fenton, 2015). The qualitative data from that study are revisited and comments are analysed in terms of themes indicative of ‘organisational professionalism,’ such as reliance on agency procedures, the importance of the role of managers and the redundancy of a working theoretical and ethical knowledge base (Evetts, 2003). Findings suggest that ‘organisational professionalism’ is insidiously becoming the social work professional practice framework. Dangers of adherence to such a framework are suggested, especially in terms of the difficulty it might cause for social workers to demonstrate ‘moral courage’ (Morley and Macfarlane, 2014, p346) in the face of the shift to neoliberal frames of reference and ubiquitous managerialism.

AB - This paper considers findings from a larger study that explored value tensions and ethical stress experienced by criminal justice social workers across Scotland (Fenton, 2015). The qualitative data from that study are revisited and comments are analysed in terms of themes indicative of ‘organisational professionalism,’ such as reliance on agency procedures, the importance of the role of managers and the redundancy of a working theoretical and ethical knowledge base (Evetts, 2003). Findings suggest that ‘organisational professionalism’ is insidiously becoming the social work professional practice framework. Dangers of adherence to such a framework are suggested, especially in terms of the difficulty it might cause for social workers to demonstrate ‘moral courage’ (Morley and Macfarlane, 2014, p346) in the face of the shift to neoliberal frames of reference and ubiquitous managerialism.

KW - Neoliberalism

KW - Social work education

KW - Professionalism

U2 - 10.1332/204986016X14651166264156

DO - 10.1332/204986016X14651166264156

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 199

EP - 215

JO - Critical and Radical Social Work

JF - Critical and Radical Social Work

SN - 2049-8608

IS - 2

ER -