‘Organizational recidivism’ and trust repair: A story of failed detectives

Sabina Siebert, Graeme Martin, Branko Bozic

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    118 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Purpose: Over the last decade, trust repair has become an important theoretical and practical concern in HRM. The purpose of this paper is to explain why organisations fail to repair their stakeholders’ trust following a series of trust breaches.

    Design/methodology/approach: The authors adopt a process theory approach and the analytical frame of a detective novel to investigate reputational scandals in RBS. In doing so, the authors explore the interweaving of two stories: the story of the “crime” (the bank’s actions which led to breaches of trust) and the story of the “detectives” (parliamentary, regulatory and press investigators).

    Findings: The study suggests that the organisation’s failure to repair trust is associated with ineffective detection of what went wrong in the bank and why.

    Practical implications: The authors argue that HR practitioners appreciate the complicated and unfolding nature of repeated transgressions, which, we argue, is addressed by approaching trust repair from a process perspective.

    Social implications: An organisation may be admitting the destructive impact of the event on trust, and beginning to show willingness to accept responsibility for the violation, but at the same time a new transgression may happen, further damaging trust and derailing trust repair efforts. Therefore, what is needed in organisations is a longitudinal analysis that takes into account organisational history, including the history of earlier wrongdoings.

    Originality/value: The paper is one of the few that had analysed trust repair using a process perspective and in using the metaphor of the detective novel in providing a more complete and nuanced story by telling is from two sides.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)328-345
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance
    Volume5
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 3 Dec 2018

    Fingerprint

    Recidivism
    Trust repair
    Breach
    Transgression
    Responsibility
    Process theory
    Willingness to accept
    Wrongdoing
    Design methodology
    Violations
    Scandal
    Stakeholders
    Crime
    Repair
    Longitudinal analysis

    Keywords

    • banking
    • detective story
    • organizational recidivism
    • process theory
    • trust breach
    • trust repair
    • Organizational trust repair
    • Detective novel metaphor
    • Process theory

    Cite this

    @article{d5ceb477d20f44b9963c094a175097eb,
    title = "‘Organizational recidivism’ and trust repair: A story of failed detectives",
    abstract = "Purpose: Over the last decade, trust repair has become an important theoretical and practical concern in HRM. The purpose of this paper is to explain why organisations fail to repair their stakeholders’ trust following a series of trust breaches.Design/methodology/approach: The authors adopt a process theory approach and the analytical frame of a detective novel to investigate reputational scandals in RBS. In doing so, the authors explore the interweaving of two stories: the story of the “crime” (the bank’s actions which led to breaches of trust) and the story of the “detectives” (parliamentary, regulatory and press investigators).Findings: The study suggests that the organisation’s failure to repair trust is associated with ineffective detection of what went wrong in the bank and why.Practical implications: The authors argue that HR practitioners appreciate the complicated and unfolding nature of repeated transgressions, which, we argue, is addressed by approaching trust repair from a process perspective.Social implications: An organisation may be admitting the destructive impact of the event on trust, and beginning to show willingness to accept responsibility for the violation, but at the same time a new transgression may happen, further damaging trust and derailing trust repair efforts. Therefore, what is needed in organisations is a longitudinal analysis that takes into account organisational history, including the history of earlier wrongdoings.Originality/value: The paper is one of the few that had analysed trust repair using a process perspective and in using the metaphor of the detective novel in providing a more complete and nuanced story by telling is from two sides.",
    keywords = "banking, detective story, organizational recidivism, process theory, trust breach, trust repair, Organizational trust repair, Detective novel metaphor, Process theory",
    author = "Sabina Siebert and Graeme Martin and Branko Bozic",
    note = "No funding",
    year = "2018",
    month = "12",
    day = "3",
    doi = "10.1108/JOEPP-07-2018-0054",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "328--345",
    journal = "Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance",
    issn = "2051-6614",
    publisher = "Emerald",
    number = "4",

    }

    ‘Organizational recidivism’ and trust repair : A story of failed detectives. / Siebert, Sabina; Martin, Graeme; Bozic, Branko.

    In: Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, Vol. 5, No. 4, 03.12.2018, p. 328-345.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - ‘Organizational recidivism’ and trust repair

    T2 - A story of failed detectives

    AU - Siebert, Sabina

    AU - Martin, Graeme

    AU - Bozic, Branko

    N1 - No funding

    PY - 2018/12/3

    Y1 - 2018/12/3

    N2 - Purpose: Over the last decade, trust repair has become an important theoretical and practical concern in HRM. The purpose of this paper is to explain why organisations fail to repair their stakeholders’ trust following a series of trust breaches.Design/methodology/approach: The authors adopt a process theory approach and the analytical frame of a detective novel to investigate reputational scandals in RBS. In doing so, the authors explore the interweaving of two stories: the story of the “crime” (the bank’s actions which led to breaches of trust) and the story of the “detectives” (parliamentary, regulatory and press investigators).Findings: The study suggests that the organisation’s failure to repair trust is associated with ineffective detection of what went wrong in the bank and why.Practical implications: The authors argue that HR practitioners appreciate the complicated and unfolding nature of repeated transgressions, which, we argue, is addressed by approaching trust repair from a process perspective.Social implications: An organisation may be admitting the destructive impact of the event on trust, and beginning to show willingness to accept responsibility for the violation, but at the same time a new transgression may happen, further damaging trust and derailing trust repair efforts. Therefore, what is needed in organisations is a longitudinal analysis that takes into account organisational history, including the history of earlier wrongdoings.Originality/value: The paper is one of the few that had analysed trust repair using a process perspective and in using the metaphor of the detective novel in providing a more complete and nuanced story by telling is from two sides.

    AB - Purpose: Over the last decade, trust repair has become an important theoretical and practical concern in HRM. The purpose of this paper is to explain why organisations fail to repair their stakeholders’ trust following a series of trust breaches.Design/methodology/approach: The authors adopt a process theory approach and the analytical frame of a detective novel to investigate reputational scandals in RBS. In doing so, the authors explore the interweaving of two stories: the story of the “crime” (the bank’s actions which led to breaches of trust) and the story of the “detectives” (parliamentary, regulatory and press investigators).Findings: The study suggests that the organisation’s failure to repair trust is associated with ineffective detection of what went wrong in the bank and why.Practical implications: The authors argue that HR practitioners appreciate the complicated and unfolding nature of repeated transgressions, which, we argue, is addressed by approaching trust repair from a process perspective.Social implications: An organisation may be admitting the destructive impact of the event on trust, and beginning to show willingness to accept responsibility for the violation, but at the same time a new transgression may happen, further damaging trust and derailing trust repair efforts. Therefore, what is needed in organisations is a longitudinal analysis that takes into account organisational history, including the history of earlier wrongdoings.Originality/value: The paper is one of the few that had analysed trust repair using a process perspective and in using the metaphor of the detective novel in providing a more complete and nuanced story by telling is from two sides.

    KW - banking

    KW - detective story

    KW - organizational recidivism

    KW - process theory

    KW - trust breach

    KW - trust repair

    KW - Organizational trust repair

    KW - Detective novel metaphor

    KW - Process theory

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055118807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/JOEPP-07-2018-0054

    DO - 10.1108/JOEPP-07-2018-0054

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 328

    EP - 345

    JO - Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance

    JF - Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance

    SN - 2051-6614

    IS - 4

    ER -