Othering intellectual disability: Two models of classification from the 19th century

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper considers two models of idiocy: one based around quantitative deviation from the norm and the other on qualitative variation. In doing so, the paper shows three things. First, it shows that apparently contradictory strategies coexist within the same discourses. Second, both cases produce the idiot as Other. Third, that the production and reproduction of Otherness creates difficulties in policing the conceptual boundary between the normal and the abnormal. The maintenance of boundaries does not adhere to either the essential nature of intellectual disability or logical coherence. Instead it is something that has to be perpetually accomplished. This has important consequences for the linkage between psychological models of intellectual disability and social inclusion. The paper concludes that no discourse on intellectual disability can eliminate Otherness.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)541-555
    Number of pages15
    JournalTheory and Psychology
    Volume22
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

    Keywords

    • boundaries
    • deconstruction
    • DEFINITION
    • history
    • Intellectual disability
    • Mental retardation
    • Other
    • Theory

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Othering intellectual disability: Two models of classification from the 19th century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this