Paired reciprocal peer tutoring in undergraduate economics

Keith Topping, Shirley Hill, Andy McKaig, Chris Rogers, Nina Rushi, David Young

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A same-year paired reciprocal peer tutoring experiment was undertaken with 125 undergraduates in a year-long class in mathematical economics. Final degree assessment results for the experimental group were, in general, not significantly statistically different from those of the previous (comparison) year. However, specific structured subjective feedback from the students indicated that the peer tutoring had improved their transferable skills in a number of areas. Furthermore, students who regularly attended the peer tutoring sessions obtained significantly better degree assessment outcomes, and gave significantly better feedback about improved transferable skills, than those who did not. Additionally, student drop-out rates were lower in the experimental than in the comparison year. It was concluded that peer tutoring on a substitutional basis cost-effectively added value to teaching and learning in higher education.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)96-113
    Number of pages18
    JournalInnovations in Education and Teaching International
    Volume34
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1997

    Fingerprint

    economics
    student
    drop-out
    value added
    experiment
    Teaching
    costs
    learning
    education
    Group

    Cite this

    Topping, Keith ; Hill, Shirley ; McKaig, Andy ; Rogers, Chris ; Rushi, Nina ; Young, David. / Paired reciprocal peer tutoring in undergraduate economics. In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 1997 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 96-113.
    @article{0cdfcb0dd69e487c861a2a3bf9d8a17e,
    title = "Paired reciprocal peer tutoring in undergraduate economics",
    abstract = "A same-year paired reciprocal peer tutoring experiment was undertaken with 125 undergraduates in a year-long class in mathematical economics. Final degree assessment results for the experimental group were, in general, not significantly statistically different from those of the previous (comparison) year. However, specific structured subjective feedback from the students indicated that the peer tutoring had improved their transferable skills in a number of areas. Furthermore, students who regularly attended the peer tutoring sessions obtained significantly better degree assessment outcomes, and gave significantly better feedback about improved transferable skills, than those who did not. Additionally, student drop-out rates were lower in the experimental than in the comparison year. It was concluded that peer tutoring on a substitutional basis cost-effectively added value to teaching and learning in higher education.",
    author = "Keith Topping and Shirley Hill and Andy McKaig and Chris Rogers and Nina Rushi and David Young",
    year = "1997",
    doi = "10.1080/1355800970340205",
    language = "English",
    volume = "34",
    pages = "96--113",
    journal = "Innovations in Education and Teaching International",
    issn = "1470-3297",
    publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
    number = "2",

    }

    Paired reciprocal peer tutoring in undergraduate economics. / Topping, Keith; Hill, Shirley; McKaig, Andy; Rogers, Chris; Rushi, Nina; Young, David.

    In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 34, No. 2, 1997, p. 96-113.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Paired reciprocal peer tutoring in undergraduate economics

    AU - Topping, Keith

    AU - Hill, Shirley

    AU - McKaig, Andy

    AU - Rogers, Chris

    AU - Rushi, Nina

    AU - Young, David

    PY - 1997

    Y1 - 1997

    N2 - A same-year paired reciprocal peer tutoring experiment was undertaken with 125 undergraduates in a year-long class in mathematical economics. Final degree assessment results for the experimental group were, in general, not significantly statistically different from those of the previous (comparison) year. However, specific structured subjective feedback from the students indicated that the peer tutoring had improved their transferable skills in a number of areas. Furthermore, students who regularly attended the peer tutoring sessions obtained significantly better degree assessment outcomes, and gave significantly better feedback about improved transferable skills, than those who did not. Additionally, student drop-out rates were lower in the experimental than in the comparison year. It was concluded that peer tutoring on a substitutional basis cost-effectively added value to teaching and learning in higher education.

    AB - A same-year paired reciprocal peer tutoring experiment was undertaken with 125 undergraduates in a year-long class in mathematical economics. Final degree assessment results for the experimental group were, in general, not significantly statistically different from those of the previous (comparison) year. However, specific structured subjective feedback from the students indicated that the peer tutoring had improved their transferable skills in a number of areas. Furthermore, students who regularly attended the peer tutoring sessions obtained significantly better degree assessment outcomes, and gave significantly better feedback about improved transferable skills, than those who did not. Additionally, student drop-out rates were lower in the experimental than in the comparison year. It was concluded that peer tutoring on a substitutional basis cost-effectively added value to teaching and learning in higher education.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21744441015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/1355800970340205

    DO - 10.1080/1355800970340205

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:21744441015

    VL - 34

    SP - 96

    EP - 113

    JO - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

    JF - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

    SN - 1470-3297

    IS - 2

    ER -